Clinicians Agreement in Establishing Glaucomatous Progression Using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph

Ophthalmology

Volumn 116, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 14-24

  Vizzeri, Gianmarco ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a   Martinez de la Casa, Jose M ^b,c   Alencar, Luciana M ^a,d   Bowd, Christopher ^a   Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan ^a   Medeiros, Felipe A ^a   Sample, Pamela ^a   Zangwill, Linda M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 57949112442     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.030     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Weinreb R.N. Laser scanning tomography to diagnose and monitor glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 4 (1993) 3-6
2. Cioffi G.A., Robin A.L., Eastman R.D., et al. Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope: reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 100 (1993) 57-62
3. Rohrschneider K., Burk R.O., Kruse F.E., and Volcker H.E. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology 101 (1994) 1044-1049
4. Mikelberg F.S., Parfitt C.M., Swindale N.V., et al. Ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma 4 (1995) 242-247
5. Zangwill L.M., van Horn S., de Souza Lima M., et al. Optic nerve head topography in ocular hypertensive eyes using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol 122 (1996) 520-525
6. Uchida H., Brigatti L., and Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37 (1996) 2393-2401
7. Hatch W.V., Flanagan J.G., Etchells E.E., et al. Laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve head in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 81 (1997) 871-876
8. Wollstein G., Garway-Heath D.F., and Hitchings R.A. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 1557-1563
9. Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., Berry C.C., et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol 119 (2001) 985-993
10. Sanchez-Galeana C., Bowd C., Blumenthal E.Z., et al. Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 1812-1818
11. Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., et al. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 1008-1015
12. Bowd C., Zangwill L.M., Medeiros F.A., et al. Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 2889-2895
13. Pueyo V., Polo V., Larrosa J.M., et al. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph, optical coherence tomograph, and scanning laser polarimeter in open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 16 (2007) 173-177
14. Chauhan B.C., McCormick T.A., Nicolela M.T., and LeBlanc R.P. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol 119 (2001) 1492-1499
15. Artes P.H., and Chauhan B.C. Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 24 (2005) 333-354
16. Patterson A.J., Garway-Heath D.F., Strouthidis N.G., and Crabb D.P. A new statistical approach for quantifying change in series of retinal and optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 1659-1667
17. Kalaboukhova L., Fridhammar V., and Lindblom B. Glaucoma follow-up by the Heidelberg retina tomograph-new graphical analysis of optic disc topography changes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244 (2006) 654-662
18. Kourkoutas D., Buys Y.M., Flanagan J.G., et al. Comparison of glaucoma progression evaluated with Heidelberg retina tomograph II versus optic nerve head stereophotographs. Can J Ophthalmol 42 (2007) 82-88
19. Chauhan B.C., Blanchard J.W., Hamilton D.C., and LeBlanc R.P. Technique for detecting serial topographic changes in the optic disc and peripapillary retina using scanning laser tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 (2000) 775-782
20. Werner E.B., Bishop K.I., Koelle J., et al. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 106 (1988) 619-623
21. Heijl A., Leske M.C., Bengtsson B., et al., Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 120 (2002) 1268-1279
22. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 126 (1998) 487-497
23. Cohen J. A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20 (1960) 37-46
24. How to interpret progression. HRT. Dossenheim, Germany: Heidelberg Engineering; year:xx-xx. http://www.heidelbergengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/hrttutqg_doc_howtointerpretprogression_031705.pdf Accessed August 11, 2005
25. Feinstein A.R., and Cicchetti D.V. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43 (1990) 543-549
26. Bowd C., Balasubramanian M., Weinreb R.N., et al. Performance of confocal scanning laser tomograph topographic change analysis (TCA) for assessing glaucomatous progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2008) Oct 3 [epub ahead of print].
27. Coleman A., Friedman D., Gandolfi S., et al. Levels of evidence of diagnostic studies. In: Weinreb R.N., and Greve E.L. (Eds). Glaucoma Diagnosis Structure and Function: Reports and consensus statements of the 1st Global AIGS Meeting (2004), Kugler, The Hague, The Netherlands 9-12 Consensus Series. Association of International Glaucoma Societies. vol. 1.