Document theory

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 43, Issue , 2009, Pages 1-55

  Lund, Niels Windfeld ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57949095181     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.2009.1440430116     Document Type: Review

References (116)

1. Andersen, J. (2002). Ascribing cognitive authority to scholarly documents: On the (possible) role of knowledge organization in scholarly communication. Proceedings of the Seventh International ISKO Conference, 28-37.
2. Andersen, J. (2004). Analyzing the role of knowledge organization in scholarly communication: An inquiry into the intellectual foundation of knowledge organization. Copenhagen: Department of Information Studies, Royal School of Library and Information Science. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from www.db.dk/dbi/samling/phd/jackandersen-phd.pdf
3. Andersen, J. (2006). Social change, modernity and bibliography: Bibliography as a document and a genre in the global learning society. Proceedings of the Ninth International ISKO Conference, 107-114.
4. Andersen, J. (2008). The collection and organization of written knowledge. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing history, society, school, individual, text (pp. 177-190). New York: Erlbaum.
5. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. London: Verso.
6. André, J., Furuta, R., & Quint, V. (1989). Structured documents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bradford, S. C. (1948). Fifty years of documentation. London: Crosby Lockwood.
8. Briet, S. (1951). Qu'est-ce que la documentation? Paris: EDIT.
9. Briet, S. (2006). What is documentation? English translation of the classic French text (R. E. Day, L. Martinet, & H. G. B. Anghelescu, Trans.). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.
10. Brooks, T. A. (2001). Where is meaning when form is gone? Knowledge representation on the Web. Information Research, 6(2). Retrieved August 20,2007, from InformationR.net/ir/6-2/paper93.html
11. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1996, May). The social life of documents. First Monday. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from www.firstmonday.org/ issues/issue1/documents/index.html
12. Buckland, M. K (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42, 351-360.
13. Buckland, M. K. (1995). The centenary of "Madame Documentation": Suzanne Briet, 1894-1989. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 235-237.
14. Buckland, M. K. (1997). What is a "document"? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 804-809.
15. Buckland, M. K. (1998). What is a "digital" document? Document Numerique, 2(2), 221-230.
16. Buckland, M. K. (1999). The landscape of information science: The American Society for Information Science at 62. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 970-974.
17. Buckland, M. K. (2006). A brief biography of Suzanne Briet. In S. Briet, What is documentation? English translation of the classic French text (pp. 1-6). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.
18. Buckland, M. K. (2007). Suzanne Briet, 1894-1989. "Madame Documentation." Retrieved January 3, 2008, from people.ischool. berkeley.edu/~buckland/briet.html
19. Buckland, M., & Hahn, T. B. (Eds.) (1998). Historical studies in information science. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
20. Buckland, M. K., & Liu, Z. (1995). History of information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 30, 385-416.
21. Capurro, R., & Hjørland, B. (2003). The concept of information. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 343-425.
22. Day, R. E. (1996). LIS, method, and postmodern science. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 37(4), 317-324.
23. Day, R. E. (1997). Paul Otlet's book and the writing of social space. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 310-317.
24. Day, R. E. (2000a). The "conduit metaphor" and the nature and politics of information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 805-811.
25. Day, R. E. (2000b). Tropes, history, and ethics in professional discourse and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 469-475.
26. Day, R. E. (2001). The modern invention of information: Discourse, history, and power. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
27. Day, R. E. (2005a). Poststructuralism and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 575-604.
28. Day, R. E. (2005b). Surface: Material infrastructure for space. In P. Turner & E. Davenport (Eds.), Spaces, spatiality, and technology (pp. 139-150). Amsterdam: Springer-Verlag.
29. Desantes Guanter, J. M. (1987). Teoría y régimen jurídico de la documentación [Theory and legal status of documentation]. Madrid, Spain: Eudema.
30. Donker Duyvis, F. (1959). Die entstehung des Wortes " Dokumentation" im namen des FID [The emergence of the word "documentation" in the name of the FID]. Revue de Documentation, 26, 15-16.
31. Drucker, J. (1994). The visible word: Experimental typography and modern art, 1909-1923. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Drucker, J. (2007). Excerpts and entanglements. In R. Skare, N. W. Lund, & A. Vãrheim (Eds.), A document (re)turn: Contributions from a research field in transition (pp. 41-52). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
33. Fairthorne, R. A. (1954). The theory of communication. Aslib Proceedings, 6, 255-267.
34. Farkas-Conn, I. S. (1990). From documentation to information science: The beginnings and early development of the American Documentation Institute-American Society for Information Science. New York: Greenwood.
35. Fayet-Scribe, S. (1997). The cross fertilization of the U. S. public library and the French documentation model (IIB, French Correspondent of FID) through the French associations between World War I and World War II. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 782-793.
36. Fayet-Scribe, S. (2000). Histoire de la documentation en France: Culture, science et technologie de l'information 1895-1937 [History of documentation in France: Culture, science and information technology]. Paris: CNRS Editions.
37. Fjordback Søndergaard, T., Andersen, J., & Hjerland, B. (2003). Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information. Revising and updating the UNISIST-model. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 278-320.
38. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this classroom? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House, Vintage.
40. Foucault, M. (2002). The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Harper & Row.
41. Francke, H. (2005). What's in a name? Contextualizing the document concept. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 12, 61-69.
42. Frohmann, B. (1992). The power of images: Adiscourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint. Journal of Documentation, 48(4), 365-386.
43. Frohmann, B. (1994). Discourse analysis as a research method in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 16, 119-138.
44. Frohmann, B. (1998). The role of the scientific paper in science information systems. Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on the History and Heritage of Science Information Systems. Retrieved October 3, 2006, from www.chemheritage.org/explore/ASIS-documents/ASIS98-main.htm
45. Frohmann, B. (2000). Discourse and documentation: Some implications for pedagogy and research. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 42, 13-28.
46. Frohmann, B. (2004). Deflating information: From science studies to documentation. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
47. Frohmann, B. (2007). Multiplicity, materiality, and autonomous agency of documentation. In R. Skare, N. W. Lund, & A. Vârheim (Eds.), A document (re)turn: Contributions from a research field in transition (pp. 27-39). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
48. García Gutiérrez, A. L. (1984). Lingüística documental: Aplicación a la documentación de la communicaión social [Documentary linguistics: Applying social communication to documentation]. Barcelona, Spain: Mitre.
49. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)
51. Hayles, N. K (2003). Translating media: Why we should rethink textuality. Yale Journal of Criticism, 16, 263-290.
52. Hjørland, B. (2000). Documents, memory institutions and information science. Journal of Documentation, 56(1), 27-41.
53. Houser, L. (1986). Documents: The domain of library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 8, 163-188.
54. Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge & Society, 6, 1-40.
55. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
57. Levy, D. M. (1988). Topics in document research. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Document Processing Systems, 87-193.
58. Levy, D. M. (1994). Fixed or fluid? Document stability and new media. Proceedings of the 1994 ACM European Conference on Hypermedia Technology, Edinburgh, 24-31.
59. Levy, D. M. (2001). Scrolling forward: Making sense of documents in the digital age. New York: Arcade.
60. López-Yepes, J. (1995). La documentación como disciplina: Teoría e historia [Documentation as a discipline: Theory and History] (2nd ed.). Pamplona, Spain: EUNSA.
61. López-Yepes, J. (2000). Human being and document: From Homo Sapiens to Homo Documentator. Journal of Spanish Research on Information Science, 1(1), 17-22.
62. Lund, N. W. (1998). Folkebiblioteket som dokumentationsvidenskabeligt forskningsfelt [The public library as a research field for documentation science]. Norsk Tidsskrift for Bibliotekforskning, 4(11), 75-102.
63. Lund, N. W. (1999a). Documentation studies is close to LIS, but not quite the same! On the scientific and educational approaches in the Tromsø Curriculum for Librarianship. Proceedings from the 3rd British Nordic Conference on Library and Information Studies, Borås, 43-48.
64. Lund, N. W. (1999b). Omrids af en dokumentationsvidenskab. [Outline of a science of documentation]. Norsk Tidsskrift for Bibliotekforskning, 4(12), 24-47.
65. Lund, N. W. (2003). Omrids af en dokumentationsvidenskab Anno 2003 [Outline of a science of documentation Anno 2003]. Norsk Tidsskrift for Bibliotekforskning, 16, 92-127.
66. Lund, N. W. (2004). Documentation in a complementary perspective. Aware and Responsible! Papers of a Nordic-International Colloquium on Social and Cultural Awareness and Responsibility in Library, Information and Documentation Studies, 93-102.
67. Lund, N. W. (2007). Building a discipline, creating a profession: An essay on the childhood of "dokvit." In R. Skare, N. W. Lund, & A. Vårheim (Eds.), A document (re)turn: Contributions from a research field in transition (pp. 11-26). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
68. Machlup, F. (1983). Semantic quirks in studies of information. In F. Machlup & U. Mansfield (Eds.), The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages (pp. 641-671). New York: Wiley.
69. Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
70. Martinez-Comeche, J. A. (2000). The nature and qualities of the document in archives, libraries and information centres and museums. Journal of Spanish Research on Information Science, 1(1), 5-10.
71. Meyriat, J. (1981). Document, documentation, documentologie. Schéma et Schématisation, 14, 51-63.
72. Meyriat, J. (1993). Un siècle de documentation: La chose et le mot [A century of documentation: The thing and the word]. Documentaliste: Science de l'information, 30(4-5), 192-198.
73. Ørom, A. (2007). The concept of information versus the concept of document. In R. Skare, N. W. Lund, & A. Vårheim (Eds.), A document (re)turn: Contributions from a research field in transition (pp. 53-72). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
74. Otlet, P. (1903). Les sciences bibliographiques et la documentation [Bibliographic science and documentation]. IIB Bulletin, 8, 125-147.
75. Otlet, P. (1907). L'organisation systematique de la documentation et le développement de l'Institut International de Bibliographie [The systematic development of documentation and development of the International Institute of Bibliography] (IIB Publication No. 82). Brussels, Belgium: The Institut.
76. Otlet, P. (1920). L'organisation internationale de la bibliographie et de la documentation [The international organization of bibliography and documentation] (IIB Publication No. 128). Brussels, Belgium: Institut International de Bibliographie.
77. Otlet, P. (1934). Traité de documentation [Treatise on documentation] (IIB Publication No. 197). Brussels, Belgium: Editions Mundaneum.
78. Otlet, P. (1935). Monde: Essai d'universalisme [The world: Essay on universalism]. Brussels, Belgium: Editions Mundaneum.
79. Otlet, P. (1990). International organisation and dissemination of knowledge: Selected essays of Paul Otlet (W. B. Rayward, Ed. & Trans.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
80. Pais, A. (1991). Niels Bohr's times: In physics, philosophy and polity. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
81. Pedauque, R. T. (2003). Document: Form, sign and medium, as reformulated for electronic documents. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/documents/archives0/00/00/05/94/index-fr.html
82. Pedauque, R. T. (2006). Le document àla lumière du numérique [The document in the light of the digital]. Caen, France: C&F éditions.
83. Pedauque, R. T. (2007). La redocumentarisation du monde [The redocumentalization of the world]. Toulouse, France: Cépaduès éditions.
84. Peirce, C. S. (1894). What is a sign? (MS 404). Retrieved August 20, 2007, from www.iupui.edu/~peirce/ep/ep2/ep2book/ch02/ep2ch2.htm.
85. Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. London: Sage.
86. Quint, V., & Vatton, I. (2004). Techniques for authoring complex XML documents. Document Engineering, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, 115-123.
87. Ranganathan, S. E. (Ed.). (1963). Documentation and its facets. London: Asia Publishing House.
88. Rayward, W. B. (1975). The universe of information: The work of Paul Otlet for documentation and international organization (FID Publication 520). Moscow: VINITI.
89. Rayward, W. B. (1991). The Case of Paul Otlet, pioneer of information science, internationalist, visionary: Reflection on biography. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 23, 135-145.
90. Rayward, W. B. (1992). Restructuring and mobilising information in documents: A historical perspective. In P. Vakkari & B. Cronin (Eds.), Conceptions of library and information science: Historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 50-68). London: Taylor Graham.
91. Rayward, W. B. (1994). Visions of Xanadu: Paul Otlet (1868-1944) and hypertext. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 235-250.
92. Rayward, W. B. (1997). The origins of information science and the work of the International Institute of Bibliography/International Federation for Documentation and Information (FID). Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 289-300.
93. Renear, A., & Dubin, D. (2003). Towards identity conditions for digital documents. Proceedings of the 2003 Dublin Core Conference. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from www.siderean.com/dc2003/503-Paper71.pdf
94. Rey, A. (1992). Dictionnaire historique de la langue française contenant les mots français en usage et quelques autres délaissés [Historical dictionary of the French language containing words in use and a few neglected others]. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.
95. Riles, A. (Ed.). (2006). Documents: Artifacts of modern knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
96. Ros Garcia, J. (2000). El concepto de documentación en la doctrina española: Teoría, historia y metodología de las ciencias de la documentación [The concept of documentation in Spanish: Theory, history, and methodology of the science of documentation] 1975-2000. Congreso Universitario de Ciencias de la Documentación, 153-185.
97. Sagredo Fernández, F., & Izquierdo Arroyo, J. M. (1983). Concepción lógico-lingüística de la documentación [The concept of logical-linguistic documentation]. Madrid, Spain: Ibercom, Red Comnet de la Unesco.
98. Schürmeyer, W. (1978). Aufgaben und Methoden der Dokumentation [Tasks and methods of documentation]. Reprinted in P. R. Frank (Ed.), Von der Systematischen Bibliographie zur Dokumentation (pp. 385-397). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Original work published in 1935)
99. Shillingsburg, P. (1991). Text as matter, concept, and action. Studies in Bibliography, 44, 31-82.
100. Simpson, J. A., & Weiner, E. S. C. (1989). Oxford English dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
101. Skare, R., Lund, N. W., & Vârheim, A. (Eds.). (2007). A document (re)turn: Contributions from a research field in transition. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
102. Smith, D. E. (1974). The social construction of documentary reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44(4), 257-268.
103. Smith, D. E. (1984). Textually mediated social organization. International Social Science Journal, 36, 59-75.
104. Smith, D. E. (1990a). The conceptual practices of power. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
105. Smith, D. E. (1990b). Texts, facts and feminity. London: Routledge.
106. Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social critique: Theory and investigations. Toronto: University of Tbronto Press.
107. Smith, D. E., & Schryer, C. R (2008). On documentary society. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing history, society, school, individual, text (pp. 113-127). New York: Erlbaum.
108. Strauss, A. (1978). A social world perspective. In N. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 119-128). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
109. Suominen, V. (1997). Filling empty space: A treatise on semiotic structures in information retrieval, in documentation, and in related research (Acta Universitatis Ouluiensis, Humaniora, B27). Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu.
110. Suominen, V. (2004). Hermeneutics of metadocumentation and librarianship. Aware and Responsible! Papers of a Nordic-International Colloquium on Social and Cultural Awareness and Responsibility in Library, Information and Documentation Studies, 141-167.
111. Suominen, V. (2007). A structural approach to the history of documentary contents: Documentation studies for librarianship. In R. Skare, N. W. Lund, & A. Vârheim (Eds.), A document (re)turn: Contributions from a research field in transition (pp. 243-264). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
112. Woledge, G. (1983). "Bibliography" and " documentation": Words and ideas. Journal of Documentation, 39(4), 266-279.
113. Woolgar, S. (1990). Time and documents in researcher interaction: Some ways of making out what is happening in experimental science. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 123-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
114. Zacklad, M. (2000). La théorie des transactions intellectuelles: Une approache gestionnaire et cognitive pour le traitement du COS [The theory of intellectual transactions: A manageable and cognitive approach for the treatment of COS]. Intellectica, 30, 195-222.
115. Zacklad, M. (2004). Processus de documentarisation dans les Documents pour l'Action (DopA): Statut des annotations et technologies de la coopération associées [Process for documentation in the Documents for Action (DopA): Status of the annotations and associated technologies for cooperation]. Le numérique: Impact sur le cycle de vie du document pour une analyse interdisciplinaire. Retrieved January 11, 2008, from archivesic. ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/06/24/23/PDF/sic-00001072.pdf
116. Zacklad, M. (2006). Documentarisation processes in Documents for Action (DofA): The status of annotations and associated cooperation technologies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 205-228.