Schematic diagrams, XML and accessibility

Proceedings - Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics, TPCG 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 49-55

  Fredj, Z B ^a   Duce, D A ^a  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer graphics; Image resolution; Markup languages; Natural languages; Rendering (computer graphics); Resource description framework; Speech; Vocabulary; Web sites; XML

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; IMAGE RESOLUTION; MARKUP LANGUAGES; RENDERING (COMPUTER GRAPHICS); SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SPEECH; WEBSITES; WORLD WIDE WEB; XML;

DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; GRAPHICAL STRUCTURES; NATURAL LANGUAGES; PRESENTATION LEVEL; RESOURCE DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK; SEMANTIC LEVELS; VOCABULARY; WORK IN PROGRESS;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 57849169293     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/TPCG.2003.1206930     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. D.A. Duce, I. Herman, F.R.A. Hopgood, "Web 2D Graphics File Formats", Computer Graphics Forum, 21(1), 43-64, 2002.
2. Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.0 Specification, W3C Recommendation, 2001.http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/
3. Accessibility Features of SVG: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG-access/
4. G.Lovet and D. Dardailler. SVG Linearizer tools. W3C note. http://www/w3.org/WAI/ER/ASVG/, September 2000.
5. I. Herman and D. Dardailler. "SVG Linearization and Accessibility", Computer Graphics Forum, 21(4), pp. 777-786, 2002.
6. G.J. Badros, J.J. Tirtowidjojo, K. Marriott, B. Meyer, W. Portnoy, A. Borning, "A Constraint Extension to Scalable Vector Graphics", Tenth International World Wide Web Conference, WWW10, Hong Kong 2001. http://www.cs.washington.edu/research/constraints/web/csvg-www10/.
7. J.L. Bentley, "Little Languages", CACM, 29(8), pp.711-721, 1986.
8. B.W. Kernighan, "PIC- A language for Typesetting Graphics", Software Practice and Experience, 12, pp. 1-21, 1982.
9. E. Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press, 1983
10. Edward Tufte, Envisioning Information, Graphics Press, 1990.
11. C.A. Gurr, Effective Diagrammatic Communication: Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Issues. http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/Site/GURRCIN4.html
12. R.P. Futrell, I. Kakadiaris, J. Alexander, J.M. Futrell, C.M. Carriero and N. Nikolakis, Understanding Diagrams in Technical Documents, IEE Computer, July 1992.
13. M. Minas, Creating Semantic Representation of Diagrams. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/minas00creating.html
14. Resource Description Framework (RDF) model and syntax. W3C Recommendation. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/, February 1999.
15. G.L. Lohse, K. Biolsi, N. Walker and H.H. Rueter (1994) A Classification of visual representations, CACM, 37(12): p 36-49.
16. Z. Mikovec, P. Slavik, System for Picture Interpretation for Blind. http://cs.felk.cvut.cz/~xmikovec/bis/interact99/
17. D.J. Bennett, A.D.N Edward, Exploration of Non-seen Diagrams, ICAD'98, 1988. http://www.icad.org/websiteV2.0/Conferences/ICAD98/papers/BENNETT.PDF
18. M. Sagar, An SVG Browser for XML Languages, MSc Dissertation, School of Technology, Oxford Brookes University, September 2002.