Application of game theory for duopoly market analysis

Journal of Business Economics and Management

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 207-217

  Ginevičius, Romualdas ^a   Krivka, Algirdas ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Bertrand; Cournot; Discrete strategies; Duopoly; Game theory; Mixed strategies; Oligopoly

Indexed keywords

EID: 57849165294     PISSN: 16111699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.207-217     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Aiginger, K. 1999. The use of game theoretical models for empirical industrial organization, in Competition, Efficiency and Welfare - Essays in Honor of Manfred Neumann, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 253-277.
2. Carlton, D. W.; Perloff, J. M. 2005. Modern Industrial Organization. Fourth Edition. Berkeley, University of California. 822 p.
3. Friedman, J. W. 1988. On the strategic importance of prices versus quantities, Journal of Economics 19(4): 607-622.
4. Friedman, J. W. 1999. The legacy of Augustin Cournot. Department of Economics Working Paper 99-05, University of North Carolina.
5. Jackson, M. O.; Wilkie, S. 2000. Endogenous games and mechanisms: side payments among players [online], in EconPapers [cited 20 November 2007]. Available from Internet: 〈 http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/wpawuwpmi/ 0211008.htm〉.
6. Jacobson, D.; Andreosso-O'Callaghan, B. 1996. Industrial Economics and Organization. A European Perspective. London: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. 367 p.
7. Koons, R. C. 1992. Doxastic paradox and reputation in iterated games, in Proceedings of the 4th conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, Monterey, California. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 60-72. ISBN 1-55860-243-9.
8. Melnikas, B. 2001. Verslo efektyvumas, konkurencija ir inovacijos Rylu̧ ir Vidurio Europos šalyse: globalizacijos ir Europos integracijos aspektai [Business efficiency, competition and innovation in the East and Central European countries: aspects of globalization and European integration], Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Theory and Practice] 1(2): 107-120.
9. Ponikvar, N; Rant, M. 2007. Firm specific determinants of markup - the case of Slovenian manufacturing firms, Journal of Business Economics and Management 8(3): 203-212.
10. Rabah, A.; Stepanova, A. 2002. Second-Mover Advantage and Price Leadership in Bertrand Duopoly [online] [cited 17 November 2007]. Available from Internet: 〈http://www.cerge-ei.cz/pdf/events/papers/040330-t. pdf〉.
11. Rasmusen, E. 2006. Games and Information. An Introduction to Game Theory. Fourth Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 484 p. ISBN 978-1-4051-3666-2.
12. Saloner, G.; Shepard, A.; Podolny, J. 2001. Strategic Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 442. ISBN 0-471-38071-7.
13. Skinner, A.; Chamberlin, E. H. 2001. Oligopoly and oligopolistic interdependence: the issue of space, in Economics Broadly Considered: Essays in Honor of Warren J. Samuels, 105-124.
14. Von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O. 1953. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Third Edition. London: Oxford University Press. 641 p.