A Tangible Augmented reality interface to tiled Street Maps and its usability testing

Progress in Spatial Data Handling - 12th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, SDH 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 511-528

  Moore, Antoni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Geographic; Heuristic evaluation; Navigation

Indexed keywords

CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM; GEO VISUALIZATIONS; GEOGRAPHIC; GEOGRAPHIC OBJECTS; HEURISTIC EVALUATION; REAL-WORLD OBJECTS; TANGIBLE OBJECTS; USABILITY TESTING;

AUGMENTED REALITY; DATA HANDLING; NAVIGATION;

GEOMETRY;

EID: 57849145961     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-35589-8_33     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. ARToolKit (2006) Home Page http://www.hitl.washington.edu/artoolkit [Accessed 6th January, 2006].
2. Billinghurst M, Kato H, Poupyrev I (2001) The Magic Book: A Transitional AR Interface. Computers and Graphics, Nov:745-753.
3. Bodum L (2005) Modelling Virtual Environments for Geovisualization: A Focus on Representation. In: Dykes J, MacEachren AM, Kraak M-J (eds) Exploring Geovisualisation. Elsevier, London, pp 389-402.
4. Bowman DA, Kruijff E, LaViola JJ, Poupyrev I (2005) 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann. Chapter 11.
5. Cartwright W, Crampton J, Gartner G, Miller S, Mitchell K, Siekierska E, Wood, J (2001) Geospatial Information Visualisation User Interface Issues. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 28(1):45-60.
6. City of Dunedin (2006) Street Map http://www.cityofdunedin.com/city/? page=searchtools-street.
7. Clarke KC (2004) Mobile Mapping and Geographic Information Systems. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 31(3):131-136.
8. Crampton J (1992) A cognitive analysis of wayfinding expertise. Cartographica 29(3/4):46-65.
9. Davies C, Medyckyj-Scott D (1994) GIS usability: recommendations based on the user's view. Int J of Geographical Information Systems 8(2):175-189.
10. Davies C, Medyckyj-Scott D (1996) GIS users observed. Int J of Geographical Information Systems 10(4):363-384.
11. Frank AU (1996) Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: Cardinal Directions as an Example. Int J of Geographical Information Systems 10(3):269-290.
12. Fuhrmann S, Ahonen-Rainio P, Edsall RM, Fabrikant SI, Koua EL, Tobon C, Ware C, Wilson S (2005) Making Useful and Useable Geovisualization: Design and Evaluation Issues. In: Dykes J, MacEachren AM, Kraak M-J (eds) Exploring Geovisualisation. Elsevier, London, pp 553-566.
13. Gabbard JL, Hix D, Swan JE (1999) User-centered design and evaluation of virtual environments. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 19(6):51-59.
14. Google (2006) Google Earth. http://earth.google.com [Accessed 6th January, 2006].
15. Hackos JT, Redish JC (1998) User and task analysis for interface design. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
16. Hedley NR, Billinghurst M, Postner L, May R, Kato H (2002) Explorations in the Use of Augmented Reality for Geographic Visualization. Presence 11(2): 119-133.
17. Hollerer TH, Feiner SK (2004) Mobile Augmented Reality. In: Karimi HA, Hammad A (eds) Telegeoinformatics - Location-Based Computing and Services. CRC Press, Baton Rouge, FLA, pp 221-260.
18. Koua EL, Kraak M-J (2005) Evaluating Self-Organizing Maps for Geovisualization. In: Dykes J, MacEachren AM, Kraak M-J (eds) Exploring Geovisualisation. Elsevier, London, pp 627-644.
19. MacEachren A, Kraak M-J (2001) Research Challenges in Geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 28(1):3-12.
20. Mezzich JE, Kraemer HC, Worthington DRL, Coffman GA (1981) Assessment of Agreement Among Several Raters Formulating Multiple Diagnoses. J of Psychiatric Research 16:29-39.
21. Moore AB, Regenbrecht H (2005) The Tangible Augmented Street Map. In: ICAT 2005: Proc of the 15th Int Conf on Artificial Reality and Telexistence, pp 249- 250.
22. Nielsen J (1994a) Heuristic Evaluation. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL, Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, United States, pp 25-62.
23. Nielsen J (1994b) Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In: Proc ACM CHI'94 Conf, Boston, MA, pp 152-158.
24. Ratti C, Wang Y, Ishii H, Piper B, Frenchman D (2004) Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs): A Novel Paradigm for GIS. Transactions in GIS 8(4):407-421.
25. nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
26. Slocum TA, Blok C, Jiang B, Koussoulakou A, Montello DR, Fuhrmann S, Hedley NR (2001) Cognitive and Usability Issues in Geovisualisation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 28(1):61-76.
27. Tobon C (2005) Evaluating Geographic Visualization Tools and Methods: An Approach and Experiment Based upon User Tasks. In: Dykes J, MacEachren AM, Kraak M-J (eds) Exploring Geovisualisation. Elsevier, London, pp 645- 666.
28. nd Int Conf, GIScience 2002. Springer, Berlin, pp 333-345.
29. Wong BLW, Blandford A (2002) Analysing ambulance dispatcher decision making: Trialing emergent themes analysis. HF2002, Human Factors Conference "Design for the whole person - integrating physical, cognitive and social aspects", Melbourne, Australia.
30. Wood J, Kirschenbauer S, Dollner J, Lopes A, Bodum L (2005) Using 3D in Visualization In: Dykes J, MacEachren AM, Kraak M-J (eds) Exploring Geovisualisation. Elsevier, London, pp 295-312.