Determination of the relative importance of criteria when the number of people judging is a small sample

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 566-577

  Thiel, Tomasz ^a  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

A group of stakeholder's representatives; A small sample; Interval of the variability; Multiple criteria decision aiding; Relative importance of criteria; The homogeneity of assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 57849141696     PISSN: 20294913     EISSN: 20294921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.566-577     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Anokhin, A. M.; Glotov, V. A.; Pavel'ev, V. V.; Cherkashin, A. M. 1997. Importance coefficients of criteria: Determination methods, Avtom. Telemekh. (8): 3-35.
2. Bardauskienė, D. 2007. The expert's estimates application in the preparation of city general plan, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 13(3): 223-236.
3. Freund, J. E. 1967. Modern Elementary Statistics (third ed). Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
4. Jimenez, A.; Rios-Insua, S.; Mateos, A. 2003. A decision support system for multiattribute utility evaluation based on imprecise assignments, Decision Support Systems 36: 65-79.
5. Mousseau, V. 1992. Analyse et classification de la litterature traitant de l'importance relative des critères en aide multicritère à la decision, RAIRO/ Operations Research 26(4): 367-389.
6. Mróz, T. M.; Thiel, T. 2005. Evaluation of a heating system for buildings using multiple criteria decision analysis, Archives of Civil Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, 51(2): 281-298.
7. Noghin, V. D. 2001. What is the relative importance of criteria and how to use it in MCDM, Lecture Notes in Economics and Math. Syst. 507: 59-68.
8. Pöyhönen, M.; Hämäläinen, R. P. 2001. On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods, European Journal of Operational Research 129(3): 569-585.
9. Roy, B. 1996. Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Roy, B.; Mousseau, V. 1996. A theoretical framework for analysing the notion of relative importance of criteria, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 5: 145-159.
11. Skalka, J. M.; Bouyssou, D.; Vallee, D. 1992. ELECTER III et IV aspects metodologiques et guide d'utilisation, Document No. 25, LAMSADE. Paris.
12. Sobczyk, M. 2007. Statystyka [Statistics]. Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, wyd. 5 (in Polish).
13. Thiel, T. 2006. A proposal of defining participant preferences in a decision aiding process with participant prepresenting a collective body, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(3): 257-262.
14. Thiel, T. 2001. Solution of multicriteria decision problems related to the evaluation of selected alternatives of motorway surface construction in Poland, with sensitivity and stability analysis, in 53rd Meeting of the European Working Group - Multicriteria Aid for Decisions. Athens, March 29-30, 2001.
15. Thiel, T. 2000. Application of multicriteria decision aid methodology in building production engineering, Statyba [Journal of Civil Engineering and Management] 6(6): 420-430.
16. Thiel, T. 1996. Metodyczne aspekty wielokryterialnego wspomagania decyzji w inżynierii produkcji budowlanej [Methodological aspects of MCDA in building production engineering]. Rozprawa doktorska. Wydział Budownictwa, Architektury i Inżynierii Środowiska, Politechnika Poznańska, Poznań (in Polish).
17. Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Zagorskas, J. 2006. Sustainability compactness evaluation of the basis of GIS and Bayes rule, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 10(3): 185-207.
18. Ustinovichius, L. 2007. Methods of determining objective, subjective and integrated weights of attributes, International Journal of Management and Decision Making 8(5/6): 540-554.
19. Weber, M.; Borcherding, M. 1993. Behavioral influences on weight judgements in multi-attribute decision-making, European Journal of Operational Research 67: 1-12.
20. Viteikienė, M. 2006. Sustainable residential areas evaluation, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(2): 152-160.
21. Viteikienė, M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2007. Evaluating the sustainability of Vilnius city residential areas, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 13(2): 149-155.
22. Yeh, C.-H.; Willis, R. J.; Deng, H.; Pan, H. 1999. Task oriented weighting in multi-criteria analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 119(1): 130-146.
23. Zak, J.; Thiel, T. 2001. Multiple Criteria Evaluation of the Development Scenarios of the Mass Transit System. CD-ROM ed. In 9th WCTR World Conference on Transport Research, COEX Convention Center, Seoul, Korea, July 22-27, 2001: paper 8214, 1-20.
24. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 2007. Mehrzielselektion für Entscheidungen im Bauwessen [Multi-attribute Decisions in Construction]. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag. ISBN 978-3-8167-7203-3.