Geotechnical centrifuge modelling of debris flows

International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 229-239

  Bowman, E T ^a   Imre, B ^b   Laue, J ^b   Springman, S M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Centrifuge testing; Debris flows; Entrainment; Erosion; Physical modelling

Indexed keywords

CENTRIFUGATION; CENTRIFUGES; DEBRIS; GEOLOGIC MODELS; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; MECHANICS; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SOIL MECHANICS; SOIL TESTING; SOILS; STRESSES;

DEBRIS FLOWS; ENTRAINMENT; ERODIBLE BEDS; EROSION POTENTIALS; EROSION PROCESSES; GEOTECHNICAL CENTRIFUGES; LABORATORY SCALES; LOW STRESSES; PHYSICAL MODELLING; PRELIMINARY TESTS; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODELS; SMALL SCALES; STRESS LEVELS; SWITZERLAND; UNDRAINED LOADINGS; WATER MIXTURES;

EROSION;

EID: 57849114479     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bolton, M.D. 1986. The strength and dilatancy of sands. Géotechnique 36(1):65-78.
2. Bowman, E.T., Laue, J., Imre, B., Zweidler, A. & Springman, S.M. 2006. Debris flows in a geotechnieal centrifuge, International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Hong Kong, China, August 4-6, 2006:311-316.
3. Craig, W.H., James, R.G. & Schofield, A.N. 1988. Centrifuges in Soil Mechanics. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
4. Davies, T.R., Phillips, C.J., Pearce, A.J. & Bao, Z.X. 1991. New aspects of debris flow behaviour. Japan-U.S. Workshop on Snow Avalanche. Landslide, Debris Flow Prediction and Control, Tsukuba, Japan, September 30-October 5, 1991:443-451.
5. Hazen, A. 1892. Some physical properties of sands and gravels with reference to their use in filtration. Annual Report 24, Document No. 34. Boston: Massachusetts State Boards of Health:539-556.
6. Hungr, O., McDougall, S. & Bovis, M. 2005. Entrainment of material by debris flows. In M. Jakob & O. Hungr (eds.), Debris-flow Hazards and Related phenomena. Chichester: Praxis: 135-158.
7. Iverson, R.M. 1997. The physics of debris flows. Reviews of Geophysics 35(3):245-296.
8. Iverson, R.M. & Denlinger, R.P. 2001. Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb mixture theory. Journal of Geophysical Research 106(BI): 537-552.
9. Kutter, B.L. 1995. Recent advances in centrifuge modeling of seismic shaking. 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnieal Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri, April 2-7, 1995:927-941.
10. Nedderman, R.M. 1992. Statics and Kinematics of Granular Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. rd International DFHM Conference, Davos, Switzerland, September 10-12, 2003:883-894.
12. Rombi, J., Pooley, E.J. & Bowman, E.T. 2006. Factors influencing granular debris flow behaviour: an experimental investigation. International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics '06, Hong Kong, China, August 4-6, 2006:379-384.
13. Schofield, A.N. 1980. Cambridge Geotechnieal Centrifuge Operations. Géotechnique 30(3):227-268.
14. Schofield, A.N. & Wroth, CP. 1968. Critical State Soil Mechanics. London: McGraw-Hill.
15. Springman, S.M., Laue, J., Boyle, R., White, J. & Zweidler, A. 2001. The ETH Zurich Geotechnieal Drum Centrifuge. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geolechnics 1:59-70.
16. Steedman, R.S. & Zeng, X. 1995. Dynamics. In R.N. Taylor (ed), Geotechnieal Centrifuge Technology, London: Taylor & Francis: 168-195.
17. Takahashi, T. 1991. Debris Flow. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.
18. Wang, G., Sassa, K. & Fukuoka, H. 2003. Downslope volume enlargement of a debris slide - debris flow in the 1999, Hiroshima, Japan, rainstorm. Engineering Geology 69:309-330.
19. Weber, T.M., Laue, J. & Springman, S.M. 2006. Centrifuge modelling of sand compaction piles in soft clay under embankment load. International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geolechnics '06, Hong Kong, China, August 4-6, 2006:603-608.