Shock-wave exploration of the high-pressure phases of carbon

Science

Volumn 322, Issue 5909, 2008, Pages 1822-1825

  Knudson, M D ^a   Desjarlais, M P ^a   Dolan, D H ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON;

CARBON; DIAMOND; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HIGH PRESSURE; SHOCK WAVE;

ARTICLE; ASTRONOMY; DENSITY; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 57849111907     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1165278     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. W. B. Hubbard et al., Science 253, 648 (1991).
2. M. Ross, Nature 292, 435 (1981).
3. L. R. Benedetti et al., Science 286, 100 (1999).
4. J. D. Lindl, Inertial Confinement Fusion, The Quest for Ignition and Energy Gain Using Indirect Drive (Springer, New York, 1998).
5. M. van Thiel, F. H. Ree, High Press. Res. 10, 607 (1992).
6. A. M. Molodets, M. A. Molodets, S. S. Nabatov, in Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, S. C. Schmidt, D. P. Dandekar, J. W. Forbes, Eds. (American Institute of Physics Press, Melville, NY, 1998), pp. 91-94.
7. L. E. Fried, W. H. Howard, Phys. Rev. B 61, 8734 (2000).
8. G. I. Kerley, L. C. Chhabildas, Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND2001-2619 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2001).
9. M. P. Grumbach, R. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. B 54, 15730 (1996).
10. M. P. Grumbach and R. M. Martin also discussed the bc8 melt line. However, the melt temperature and dT/dP were estimated from the Lindemann melt criterion and observations regarding the pressure change observed for the melting of the simple cubic structure, respectively. Ab initio methods were not used in the bc8 melt line determination.
11. X. Wang, S. Scandolo, R. Car, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 185701 (2005).
12. A. A. Correa, S. A. Bonev, G. Galli, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 1204 (2006).
13. N. A. Romero, W. D. Mattson, Phys. Rev. B 76, 214113 (2007).
14. G. E. Duvall, R. A. Graham, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 523 (1977).
15. D. K. Bradley et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 195506 (2004).
16. H. Nagao et al., Phys. Plasmas 13, 052705 (2006).
17. S. Brygoo et al., Nat. Mater. 6, 274 (2007).
18. M. K. Matzen, Phys. Plasmas 4, 1519 (1997).
19. A. C. Mitchell, W. J. Nellis, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 3363 (1981).
20. G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).
21. G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251 (1994).
22. G. Kresse, J. Furthmuller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
23. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
24. xx. However, the majority of the data presented here is either in the coexistence region or the pure fluid, in which case the shocked state is expected to be hydrostatic.
25. R. W. Lemke et al., J. Appl. Phys. 98, 073530 (2005).
26. L. M. Barker, R. E. Hollenbach, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 4669 (1972).
27. J. R. Taylor, An Introduction to Error Analysis (Univ. Science Books, Sausalito, CA, ed. 2, 1982).
28. W. B. Hubbard, M. Podolak, D. J. Stevenson, in Neptune and Triton, D. P. Cruikshank, Ed. (Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, 1995), pp. 109-138.
29. M. N. Pavlovskii, Sov. Phys. Solid State 13, 741 (1971).
30. We would like to acknowledge the crew of the Sandia Z facility for their contributions in the design, fabrication, and assembly of the experiments, as well as the fielding of diagnostics. Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract no. DE-AC04-94AL85000.