Semi-coupled air/water immersed boundary approach for curvilinear dynamic overset grids with application to ship hydrodynamics

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 591-624

  Huang, Juntao ^a   Carrica, Pablo M ^a   Stern, Frederick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Curvilinear and dynamic overset grids; Free surface flows; Immersed boundary; Level set method; Semi coupled method; Ship hydrodynamics

Indexed keywords

AIR; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; BROACHING; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DROP BREAKUP; DYNAMICS; FLOW OF FLUIDS; FLOW OF WATER; FLUID DYNAMICS; HYDRAULICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; LEVEL MEASUREMENT; SHIPS; SURFACES; THEOREM PROVING; TURBULENT FLOW;

CURVILINEAR AND DYNAMIC OVERSET GRIDS; FREE SURFACE FLOWS; IMMERSED BOUNDARY; LEVEL SET METHOD; SEMI-COUPLED METHOD; SHIP HYDRODYNAMICS;

PHASE INTERFACES;

EID: 57849110484     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1758     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wilson RV, Carrica PM, Stern F. Unsteady RANS method for ship motions with application to roll for a surface combatant. Computers and Fluids 2006; 35:501-524.
2. Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Stern F. Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:1415-1433.
3. Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Noack R, Xing T, Kandasamy M, Shao J, Sakamoto N, Stern F. A dynamic overset, single-phase level set approach for viscous ship flows and large amplitude motions and maneuvering. Proceedings of the 26th ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Rome, Italy, 2006.
4. Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Stern F. An unsteady single-phase level set method for viscous free surface flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 53(2):229-256.
5. Reddy KR, Toffoletto R, Jones KRW. Numerical simulation of ship airwakes. Computers and Fluids 2000; 29:451-465.
6. Syms GF. Numerical simulation of frigate airwakes. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 2004; 18:199-207.
7. Osher S, Sethian JA. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics 1988; 79:12-49.
8. Hirt CW, Nichols BD. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 39:201-225.
9. Youngs DL. Time-dependent multimaterial flow with large fluid distortion. In Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Morton K, Baines M (eds). Academic Press: New York, 1982; 273-285.
10. Vogt M, Larsson L. Level set method for predicting viscous free surface flows. Seventh International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Nantes, France, 1999.
11. Cura Hochbaum A, Vogt M. Towards the simulation of seakeeping and maneuvering based on the computation of the free surface viscous ship flow. Twenty Fourth ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Fukoka, Japan, 2002.
12. Huang JT, Carrica PM, Stem F. Coupled ghost fluid/two-phase level set method for curvilinear body fitted grids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 55(8):867-897.
13. Peskin CS. Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. Journal of Computational Physics 1972; 10:252-271.
14. Mittal R, Iaccarino G. Immersed boundary methods. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2005; 37:239-261.
15. Thompson JF, Warsi ZUA, Mastin JW. Numerical Grid Generation. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1985.
16. Paterson EG, Wilson RV, Stern F. General-purpose parallel unsteady RANS ship hydrodynamics code: CFDShip-Iowa. IIHR Report 432, Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, The University of Iowa, 2003.
17. Menter FR. Two-equation eddy viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 1994; 32:1598-1605.
18. Lewis E (ed.). Principles of Naval Architecture, vol. III. SNAME: Jersey City, NJ, 1989; 28.
19. Sullivan PP, McWilliams JC, Moeng CH. Simulation of turbulent flow over idealized water waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2000; 404:47-85.
20. Stem F, Kim HT, Patel VC, Chen HC. A viscous-flow approach to the computation of propeller-hull interaction. Journal of Ship Research 1988; 32(4):246-262.
21. Wilson RV, Carrica PM, Stem F. Simulation of a ship breaking bow wave and induced vortices and scars. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 54(4):419-451.
22. Bell JB, Colella P, Howell LH. An efficient second-order projection method for viscous incompressible flow. Tenth AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, June 1991; 24-27.
23. Benjamin TB. Shearing flow over a wavy boundary. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1959; 6:161-205.
24. Larsson L, Stern F, Bertram V. Benchmarking of computational fluid dynamics for ship flows: the Gothenburg 2000 Workshop. Journal of Ship Research 2003; 47:63-81.
25. Hino T (ed.). Proceedings of the CFD Workshop, Tokyo, Japan, National Maritime Research Institute, 2005.
26. Gui L, Longo J, Stern F. Towing tank PIV measurement system, data and uncertainty assessment for DTMB model 5512. Experiments in Fluids 2001; 31:336-346.
27. Longo J, Stern F. Uncertainty assessment for towing tank tests with example for surface combatant DTMB model 5512. Journal of Ship Research 2005; 49:55-68.
28. Olivieri A, Campana EF, Francescutto A, Stern F. Capsize high-quality data for validation of U-RANS codes. Proceedings of the 26th ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Rome, Italy, 2006.
29. Sadat Hosseini SH, Park IR, Stern F, Olivieri A, Campana EF, Francescutto A. Complementary URANS CFD and EFD for validation of extreme motions predictions. Ninth International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, August 5-8, 2007.