Championing intellectual pluralism

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 5-12

  Parker, Lee ^a   Guthrie, James ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accounting research; Communities; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 57849103485     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09513570910922980     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Gray, R., Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. (2002), “Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 1-30.
2. Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. (1988), “Editorial”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 3-5.
3. Guthrie, J., Parker, L. and Gray, R. (2004), “Requirements and understandings for publishing academic research: an insider view”, in Humphrey, C. and Lee, W. (Eds), The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research: A Behind-The-Scenes View of Using Qualitative Research Methods, Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, NY, pp. 411-32.
4. Hopwood, A.G. (2007), “Whither accounting research”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 82 No. 5, pp. 1365-74.
5. Lee, B. and Humphrey, C. (2006), “More than a numbers game: qualitative research in accounting”, Management Decision, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 180-97.
6. Locke, J. and Lowe, A. (2008), “Evidence and implications of multiple paradigms in accounting knowledge production”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 161-91.
7. Parker, L. and Guthrie, J. (2007), “Editorial”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 1.
8. Parker, L., Guthrie, J. and Gray, R. (1998), “Accounting and management research: passwords from the gatekeepers”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 371-402.
9. Williams, P.F., Jenkins, J.G. and Ingraham, L. (2006), “The winnowing away of behavioral accounting research in the US: the process of anointing academic elites”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31, pp. 783-818.