Critical thinking in quasi-experimentation

Critical Thinking in Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 37-53

  Shadish, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57849101989     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511804632.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 297-312.
2. Campbell, D. T., & Erlebacher, A. E. (1970). How regression artifacts can mistakenly make compensatory education programs look harmful. In J. Hellmuth (Vol. Ed.), The disadvantaged child: Vol. 3. Compensatory education: A national debate (pp. 185-225). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
3. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
4. Cicirelli, V. G., and Associates. (1969). The impact of Head Start: An evaluation of the effects of Head Start on children’s cognitive and affective development, vols. 1 and 2. A Report to the Office of Economic Opportunity. Athens: Ohio University and Westinghouse Learning Corporation.
5. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
6. Cordray, D.W. (1986). Quasi-experimental analysis: A mixture of methods and judgment. In W. M. K. Trochim (Ed.), Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis (pp. 9-27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Eells, E. (1991). Probabilistic causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Faust, D. (1984). The limits of scientific reasoning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Folkman, J. (1996). Fighting cancer by attacking its blood supply. Scientific American, 275, 150-154.
10. Holland, P.W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945-970.
11. Lewis, D. (1973). Causation. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 556-567.
12. Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
13. Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14. Magidson, J. (1977). Toward a causal model approach for adjusting for preexisting differences in the nonequivalent control group situation. Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 399-420.
15. Magidson, J. (2000).Onmodels used to adjust for preexisting differences. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Research design: Donald Campbell’s legacy (Vol. 2, pp. 181-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Mark, M. M. (1986). Validity typologies and the logic and practice of quasiexperimentaton. In W. M. K. Trochim (Ed.), Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis (pp. 47-66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
18. Poulton, E. C. (1982). Influential companions: Effects of one strategy on another in the within-subjects designs of cognitive psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 673-690.
19. Rindskopf, D. (2000). Plausible rival hypotheses in measurement, design, and scientific theory. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Research design: Donald Campbell’s legacy (Vol. 1, pp. 1-12). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Rowe, P. M. (1999). What is all the hullabaloo about endostatin? The Lancet, 353-732.
21. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688-701.
22. Sackett, D. L. (1979). Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 32, 51-63.
23. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.