Nonmarket resource valuation in the postfire environment

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 305-310

  Calkin, David ^a   Jones, Greg ^a   Hyde, Kevin ^b  

^a ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b Management and Engineering Technologies International

Author keywords

Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER); Nonmarket valuation; Postfire environment

Indexed keywords

PERSONNEL TRAINING;

BURNED AREA EMERGENCY RESPONSE (BAER); DOWNSTREAM EFFECTS; ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATIONS; HUMAN LIVES; MARKET VALUES; MINIMUM VALUES; NONMARKET; NONMARKET VALUATION; POSTFIRE ENVIRONMENT; RESOURCE VALUES; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES; SOIL PRODUCTIVITIES; TEAM MEMBERS; TIME FRAMES; TREATMENT PLANS; WILDLAND FIRES;

RESOURCE VALUATION;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; FOREST RESOURCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY; WILDFIRE;

EID: 57849084362     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BURTON, T.A. 2005. Fish and stream habitat risks from uncharacteristic wildfire: Observations from 17 years of fire-related disturbances on the Boise National Forest, Idaho For. Ecol. Manag. 211(1-2):140 -149.
2. CALKIN, D.E., C.A. MONTGOMERY, N.H. SCHUMAKER, S. POLASKY, J.L. ARTHUR, AND D.J. NALLE. 2002. Developing a production possibility set of wildlife species persistence and timber harvest value. Can. J. For. Res. 32(8): 1329-1342.
3. CALKIN, D.E., K. HYDE, K. GEBERT, AND J.G. JONES. 2005. Comparing resource values at risk from wildfires with Forest Service fire suppression expenditures: Examples from 2003 Western Montana wildfire season. US For. Serv. RMRSRN-24 WWW, Rocky Mountain Res. Stn. Available online at www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_rn024.pdf; last accessed Apr. 5, 2007. 8 p.
4. CALKIN, D.E., P.R. ROBICHAUD, AND J.G. JONES. 2006. Pilot study: Improving BAER calculation of values-at-risk (JFSP 05-01-01-09). Final Rep. to Joint Fire Sciences Program. Available online at www.firescience.gov/projects/05-1-1-09/ 05-1-1-09_final_report.pdf; last accessed Apr. 5, 2007.
5. CALKIN, D.E., K.D. HYDE, P.R. ROBICHAUD, J.G. JONES, L.E. ASHMUN, AND D. LOEFFLER. 2007. Assessing post-fire values-at-risk with a new calculation tool. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-205, Rocky Mountain Res. Stn., Fort Collins, CO. 32 p.
6. DWYER, J., J. KELLY, AND M. BOWES. 1977. Improved procedures for valuation of the contribution of recreation to national economic development. Rep. 128, Water Resources Center, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL. 218 p.
7. FINNEY, M. 2005. The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire. For. Ecol. Manag. 211:97-108.
8. HUDAK, A.T., P.R. ROBICHAUD, J.B. EVANS, J. CLARK, K. LANNOM, P. MORGAN, AND C. STONER. 2004. Field validation of Burned Area Reflectance Classification (BARC) products for post fire assessment. Remote sensing for field users, Proc. of the 10th Forest Service remote sensing applications conf., Salt Lake City, UT, Apr. 5-9, 2004 [CD-ROM]. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD. 13 p.
9. HUMMEL, S.S., AND D.E. CALKIN. 2005. Costs of landscape silviculture for fire and habitat management. For. Ecol. Manag. 207(3):385-404.
10. KIRCHHOFF, S., B.G. KOLBY, AND J.T. LAFRANCE. 1997. Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: An empirical inquiry. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 33:75-93.
11. LANGE, O., AND F.M. TAYLOR. 1938. On the economic theory of socialism. McGraw-Hill, New York. 143 p.
12. MONTGOMERY, C.A. 1995. Economic analysis of the spatial dimensions of species preservation: The distribution of northern spotted owl habitat. For. Sci. 41(1):67-83.
13. MONTGOMERY, C.A. 2003. The production possibilities approach to understanding and modeling compatibility. P. 35-53 in Compatible forest management, Chap. 2, Monserud, R.A., R.W. Haynes, and A.C. Johnson (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
14. MONTGOMERY, C.A., AND R.A. POLLACK. 1995. Valuing and measuring biodiversity for comparing land-use alternatives. P. 46-55 in Proc. of the IUFRO XX World Congress, Tampere, Finland, August 6-12. Korpilaht, E., T. Salonen, and S. Oja (eds.). Finnish IUFRO World Congress Organising Committee.
15. PIGOU, A.C. 1938. The economics of welfare, 4th Ed. Macmillan, London. 976 p.
16. ROBICHAUD, P.R., J.L. BEYERS, AND D.G. NEARY. 2000. Evaluating the effectiveness of postfire rehabilitation treatments. RMRS-GTR-63, US For. Serv., Rocky Mountain Res. Stn., Fort Collins, CO. 85 p.
17. ROBICHAUD, P.R., W.J. ELLIOT, F.B. PIERSON, D.E. HALL, AND C.A. MOFFET. 2006. Erosion Risk Management Tool (ERMiT), Ver. 2006. 01.18. US For. Serv., Rocky Mountain Res. Stn., Moscow, ID. Available online at www.forest.moscowfsl.wsu.edu/fswepp/; last accessed Apr. 5, 2007.
18. ROSENBERGER, R.S., AND J.B. LOOMIS. 2001. Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values: A technical document supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan (2000 revision). US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-72, Rocky Mountain Res. Stn., Fort Collins, CO. 59 p.
19. SAVELAND, J.M. 1987. Using prescribed fire to reduce the risk of large wildfires: A break-even analysis. P. 119-122 in 9th Conf. on Fire and forest meteorology, San Diego, CA, April 21-24. American Meteorological Society, Washington, DC.
20. STEVENS, J.A., AND C.A. MONTGOMERY. 2002. Understanding the compatibility of multiple uses on forest land: A survey of multi-resource research with application to the Pacific Northwest. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-539. 44 p.
21. US FOREST SERVICE. 2004. FSM 2500 - Watershed and air management, Chap. 2520. Forest Service manual. USDA, Washington, DC.
22. USDA AND US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (USDOI). 2003. Interagency strategy for the implementation of federal wildland fire management policy. Available online at www.nifc.gov/fire_policy/pdf/ strategy.pdf; last accessed Jan. 8, 2008.
23. USDA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL (OIG). 2006. Audit report: Forest Service large fire suppression costs. Rep. 08601-44-SF. 47 p.
24. VENN, T.J., AND D.E. CALKIN. (in press). Challenges of socio-economically evaluating wildfire management on non-industrial private and public forestland in the Western United States. Small-Scale For.