Simulated attacks on CAN buses: Vehicle virus

Proceedings of the 5th IASTED Asian Conference on Communication Systems and Networks, AsiaCSN 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 66-72

  Nilsson, Dennis K ^a   Larson, Ulf E ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Attacks; CAN bus; Simulation; Vehicle; Virus

Indexed keywords

ATTACKS; AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURERS; CAN BUS; CYBER ATTACKS; ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNITS; EXTERNAL NETWORKS; FLEET MANAGEMENTS; IN-VEHICLE NETWORKS; OVER THE AIRS; REMOTE DIAGNOSTICS; SIMULATION;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTER CRIME; ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY; FIRMWARE; FLEET OPERATIONS; POWER ELECTRONICS; VIRUSES;

VEHICLES;

EID: 57749201727     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Radovan Miucic and Syed Masud Mahmud. Wireless Multicasting for Remote Software Upload in Vehicles with Realistic Vehicle Movement. Technical report, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202 USA, 2005.
2. Bosch. CAN Specification 2.0. http://www.dcd.pl/dcdpdf/can2spec.pdf, 1991. Visited August, 2007.
3. Konrad Etschberger. CAN-Based Higher Layer Protocols and Profiles, http://www.ixxat. com. Visited October, 2007.
4. Marko Wolf, Andre Weimerskirch, and Christof Paar. Security in Automotive Bus Systems. In Workshop on Embedded IT-Security in Cars, Bochum, Germany, November 2004.
5. Tobias Hoppe and Jana Dittman. Sniffing/Replay Attacks on CAN Buses: A simulated attack on the electric window lift classified using an adapted CERT taxonomy. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Embedded Systems Security (WESS), Salzburg, Austria, 2007.
6. Andreas Lang, Jana Dittman, Stefan Kiltz, and Tobias Hoppe. Future Perspectives: The car and its IP-address - A potential safety and security risk assessment. In The 26th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability and Security (SAFECOMP), Nuremberg, Germany, 2007.
7. Douglas E. Comer. Internetworking with TCP/IP, Volume 1: Principles, Protocols, and Architectures, Fourth Edition. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2000.
8. CIA. CanOpen Application Layer and Communication Profile. http://www.can-cia.org/downloads/ciaspecifications/, 2006. Visited August, 2007.
9. Konrad Etschberger. Controller Area Network. IXXAT Automation GmbH, 2001.
10. Mark Luk, Ghita Mezzour, Adrian Perrig, and Virgil Gligor. Minisec: a secure sensor network communication architecture. In IPSN '07: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pages 479-488, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press.
11. Adrian Perrig, Robert Szewczyk, Victor Wen, David E. Culler, and J. D. Tygar. SPINS: Security protocols for sensor networks. In Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 189-199, 2001.
12. Chris Karlof, Naveen Sastry, and David Wagner. TinySec: A link layer security architecture for wireless sensor networks. In SenSys '04: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 162-175, Baltimore, November 2004.
13. John D. Howard and Thomas A. Longstaff. A Common Language for Computer Security Incidents (SAND98-8667), 1998.
14. Vector Informatik. CANoe and DENoe 6.1. http://www.vector-worldwide.com/ vi-canoe-en. html, 2007. Visited August, 2007.
15. Lawrence R. Halme and Kenneth R. Bauer. AINT Misbehaving: A taxonomy of anti-intrusion techniques. In Proceedings of the 18th National Information Systems Security Conference, pages 163-172, October 1995.
16. Dennis K. Nilsson and Ulf E. Larson. Conducting Forensic Investigations of Cyber Attacks on Automobile In-Vehicle Networks. In Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on Forensic Applications and Techniques in Telecommunications, Information and Multimedia (e-Forensics), 2008.