Corrigendum to "The use of rubber foam pads and "sensory ratios" to reduce variability in static posturography assessment" [Gait Posture 29 (2009) 158-160] (DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.08.006);The use of rubber foam pads and "sensory ratios" to reduce variability in static posturography assessment

Gait and Posture

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 158-160

  Federica, Di Berardino ^a   Eliana, Filipponi ^a   Stefania, Barozzi ^a   Gianpiero, Giordano ^a   Dario, Alpini ^b   Antonio, Cesarani ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b IRCCS FONDAZIONE DON CARLO GNOCCHI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coefficient of variation; Foam pads; Static posturography; Variability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RUBBER FOAM PAD; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; STABILOGRAPHY; STANDING; VESTIBULAR SYSTEM; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 57749201603     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.11.009     Document Type: Erratum

References (15)

1. Forth K.E., Metter J.E., and Paloski W.H. Age associated differences in postural equilibrium control: a comparison between EQscore and minimum time to contact (TTCmin). Gait Posture 25 (2007) 56-62
2. Baloh R.W., Jacobson K.M., and Beykirch K. Static and dynamic posturography in patients with vestibular and cerebellar lesions. Arch. Neurol. 55 (1998) 649-654
3. Nelson S.R., D Fabio R.P., and Handerson G.H. Vestibular and sensory interaction deficit assessed by dynamic platform posturography in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 104 (1995) 62-68
4. ® ankle-sway-referenced support surface. Gait Posture 16 (2002) 264-270
5. Shumway-Cook A., and Horak F.B. Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance: suggestion from the field. Phys. Ther. 66 (1986) 1548-1550
6. Nashner L.M., Black F.O., and Wall C. 3rd. Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits. J. Neurosci. 2 (1982) 536-544
7. Contarino D., Bertora G.O., and Bergmann J.M. Balance platform: mathematical modeling for clinical evaluation. Int. Tinnitus J. 9 (2003) 23-25
8. Pérennou D., Decavel P., and Manckoundia P. Evaluation of balance in neurologic and geriatric disorders. Ann. Readapt. Med. Phys. 48 (2005) 317-335
9. Di Fabio R.P. Meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of platform posturography. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 122 (1996) 150-156
10. Horak F.B., Henry S.M., and Shumway-Cook A. Postural perturbations: new insights for treatment of balance disorders. Phys. Ther. 77 (1997) 517-533
11. Poulain I., and Giraudet G. Age-related changes of visual contribution in posture control. Gait Posture 27 (2008) 1-7
12. Wooley S.M., McCarter, and Randolf B. An assessment of foam support surfaces used in static stabilometry. Gait Posture 3 (1995) 110
13. Riley M.A., Baker A.A., Schmit J.M., and Weaver E.E. Effects of visual and auditory short-term memory tasks on the spatio-temporal dynamics and variability of postural sway. J. Mot. Behav. 37 (2005) 311-324
14. Clark S., and Riley M.A. Multisensory information for postural control: sway-referencing gain shapes center of pressure variability and temporal dynamics. Exp. Brain Res. 310 (2007) 176-299
15. Shah V.P., Midha K.K., and Dighe S. Analytical methods evaluation: bioavailability, bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 16 (1991) 249-255