Preference aggregation with graphical utility models

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 1037-1042

  Gonzales, Christophe ^a   Perny, Patrice ^a   Queiroz, Sergio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIONICS; DECISION THEORY; GRAPHIC METHODS;

COLLECTIVE DECISION MAKINGS; COMBINATORIAL STRUCTURES; COMPROMISE SOLUTIONS; DECOMPOSABILITY; DO-MAINS; GRAPHICAL MODELS; MODEL INTERACTIONS; MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORIES; MULTICRITERIA DECISION PROBLEMS; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; PREFERENCE AGGREGATIONS; PREFERENCE REPRESENTATIONS; RANKING ALGORITHMS; UTILITY FUNCTIONS; UTILITY MODELS;

THEOREM PROVING;

EID: 57749191227     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bacchus, F., and Grove, A. 1995. Graphical models for preference and utility. In UAI'95.
2. Boutilier, C.; Bacchus, F.; and Brafman, R. 2001. UCP-networks; a directed graphical representation of conditional utilities. In UAI'01.
3. Boutilier, C.; Brafman, R.; Domshlak, C.; Hoos, H.; and Poole, D. 2004a. CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. J. of Artificial Intelligence Research 21:135-191.
4. Boutilier, C.; Brafman, R.; Domshlak, C.; Hoos, H.; and Poole, D. 2004b. Preference-based constraint optimization with CP-nets. Computational Intelligence 20.
5. Brafman, R.; Domshlak, C.; and Kogan, T. 2004. On generalized additive value-function decomposition. In UAI'04.
6. Braziunas, D., and Boutilier, C. 2005. Local utility elicitation in GAI models. In UAI'05.
7. Chevaleyre, Y.; Endriss, U.; and Lang, J. 2007. Expressive power of weighted propositional formulas for cardinal preference modeling. In Proceedings of KR'07, 145-152.
8. Cowell, R.; Dawid, A.; Lauritzen, S.; and Spiegelhalter, D. 1999. Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. Stat. for Engineering and Information Science. Springer-Verlag.
9. Debreu, G. 1964. Continuity properties of Paretian utility. International Economic Review 5:285-293.
10. Engel, Y., and Wellman, M. P. 2007. Generalized value decomposition and structured multiattribute auctions. In EC'07, 227-236.
11. Fishburn, P. C. 1970. Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley.
12. Gonzales, C., and Perny, P. 2004. GAI networks for utility elicitation. In KR'04, 224-234.
13. Gonzales, C., and Perny, P. 2005. GAI networks for decision making under certainty. In IJCAI'05 - Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling.
14. Jensen, F. 1996. An introduction to Bayesian Networks. Taylor and Francis.
15. Krantz, D.; Luce, R. D.; Suppes, P.; and Tversky, A. 1971. Foundations of Measurement (Additive and Polynomial Representations), volume 1. Academic Press.
16. Nilsson, D. 1998. An efficient algorithm for finding the M most probable configurations in probabilistic expert systems. Statistics and Computing 8(2): 159-173.
17. Pini, M. S.; Rossi, F.; Venable, K. B.; and Walsh, T. 2005. Aggregating partially ordered preferences: Impossibility and possibility results. TARK 10.
18. Rossi, F.; Venable, K. B.; and Walsh, T. 2004. mCP nets: Representing and reasoning with preferences of multiple agents. In AAAI'04, 729-734.
19. Steuer, R., and Choo, E.-U. 1983. An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming. Mathematical Programming 26:326-344.
20. Wierzbicki, A. 1986. On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems. OR Spektrum 8:73-87.