Challenges of street-level child welfare reform and technology transfer: The case of team decisionmaking

Families in Society

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 512-520

  Crampton, David S ^a   Crea, Thomas M ^b   Abramson Madden, Anne ^c   Usher, Charles L ^d  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57749182914     PISSN: 10443894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1606/1044-3894.3823     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aarons, G. A., & Palinkas, L. A. (2007). Implementation of evidence-based practice in child welfare: Service provider perspectives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34, 411-419.
2. Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2006, September 28). Family to Family key elements, team decision making. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from http://www.aecf.org/upload/pdffiles/familytofamily/keyelements.pdf
3. Batterson, M., Crampton, D., Crea, T., Harris, F., Madden, A., Usher, L., et al. (2007). Implementing Family to Family. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
4. Brodkin, E. (1997). Inside the welfare contract: Discretion and accountability in state welfare administration. Social Service Review, 71, 1-33.
5. DeMuro, P., & Rideout, P. (2002). Team decisionmaking: Involving the family and community in child welfare decisions. Baltimore: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
6. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication No. 231). Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.
7. Landsman, M. J., Thompson, K., & Barber, G. (2003). Using mediation to achieve permanency for children and families. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 84(2), 229-239.
8. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9. Luongo, G. (2007). Re-thinking child welfare training models to achieve evidence-based practices. Administration in Social Work, 31(2), 87-96.
10. Marsh, P., & Crow, G. (1998). Family group conferences in child welfare. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
11. Sieppert, J. D., Hudson, J., & Unrau, Y. (2000). Family group conferencing in child welfare: Lessons from a demonstration project. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 81(4), 382-391.
12. Smith, B. D., & Donovan, S. E. F. (2003). Child welfare practice in organizational and institutional context. Social Service Review, 77(4), 541-562.
13. Usher, L., Needell, B., Wildfire, J., & Webster, D. (2007). Evaluation plan for Family to Family. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
14. van Wormer, K. (2003). Restorative justice: A model for social workpractice with families. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 84(3), 441-448.
15. Wieder, B. L., Boyle, P. E., & Hrouda, D. R. (2007). Able, willing and ready: Practitioner selection as a core component of integrated dual disorders treatment implementation. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 7(1/2), 139-165.