The HupR Receiver Domain Crystal Structure in its Nonphospho and Inhibitory Phospho States

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 385, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 51-64

  Davies, Karen M ^a   Lowe, Ed D ^a   Vénien Bryan, Catherine ^a   Johnson, Louise N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

beryllium fluoride phosphorylation mimic; HupR; response regulator; X ray crystallography

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN UPTAKE PROTEIN REGULATOR; NITROGEN REGULATORY PROTEIN; RNA POLYMERASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIMERIZATION; DOWN REGULATION; OLIGOMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

EID: 57749182194     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Lukat G.S., Lee B.H., Mottonen J.M., Stock A.M., and Stock J.B. Roles of the highly conserved aspartate and lysine residues in the response regulator of bacterial chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 266 (1991) 8348-8354
2. Zapf J., Madhusudan, Grimshaw C.E., Hoch J.A., Varughese K.I., and Whiteley J.M. A source of response regulator autophosphatase activity: the critical role of a residue adjacent to the SpoOF autophosphorylation active site. Biochemistry 37 (1998) 7725-7732
3. Stock A.M., Robinson V.L., and Goudreau P.N. Two-component signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69 (2000) 183-215
4. Dischert W., Vignais P.M., and Colbeau A. The synthesis of Rhodobacter capsulatus HupSL hydrogenase is regulated by the two-component HupT/HupR system. Mol. Microbiol. 34 (1999) 995-1006
5. Richaud P., Colbeau A., Toussaint B., and Vignais P.M. Identification and sequence analysis of the HupR1 gene, which encodes a response regulator of the NtrC family required for hydrogenase expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Bacteriol. 173 (1991) 5928-5932
6. + enhancer binding proteins in transcriptional activation. J. Struct. Biol. 156 (2006) 190-199
7. Cannon W., Bordes P., Wigneshweraraj S., and Buck M. Nucleotide-dependent triggering of RNA polymerase-DNA interactions by an AAA regulator of transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 19815-19825
8. 54-holoenzyme. J. Mol. Biol. 260 (1996) 317-331
9. + domain of transcriptional activator PspF. J. Mol. Biol. 357 (2006) 481-492
10. + protein. J. Mol. Biol. 338 (2004) 863-875
11. Wedel A., and Kustu S. The bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC is a molecular machine: ATP hydrolysis is coupled to transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 9 (1995) 2042-2052
12. Wyman C., Rombel I., North A.K., Bustamante C., and Kustu S. Unusual oligomerization required for activity of NtrC, a bacterial enhancer-binding protein. Science 275 (1997) 1658-1661
13. 54-dependent transcriptional activator. J. Bacteriol. 186 (2004) 3499-3507
14. Flashner Y., Weiss D.S., Keener J., and Kustu S. Constitutive forms of the enhancer-binding protein NtrC: evidence that essential oligomerization determinants lie in the central activation domain. J. Mol. Biol. 249 (1995) 700-713
15. Hwang I., Thorgeirsson T., Lee J., Kustu S., and Shin Y.K. Physical evidence for a phosphorylation-dependent conformational change in the enhancer-binding protein NtrC. Biochemistry 96 (1999) 4880-4885
16. Lee J., Owens J.T., Hwang I., Meares C., and Kustu S. Phosphorylation-induced signal propagation in the response regulator NtrC. J. Bacteriol. 182 (2000) 5188-5195
17. + ATPase domains. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 2552-2563
18. Gralla J.D. Signaling through sigma. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7 (2000) 530-532
19. Davies K.M., Skammaki V., Johnson L.N., and Venien-Bryan C. Structural and functional studies of the response regulator HupR. J. Mol. Biol. 359 (2006) 276-288
20. Bowman W.C., and Kranz R.G. A bacterial ATP-dependent, enhancer binding protein that activates the housekeeping RNA polymerase. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 1884-1893
21. Lenz O., and Friedrich B. A novel multicomponent regulatory system mediates H2 sensing in Alcaligenes eutrophus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998) 12474-12479
22. + ATPase assembly by two component receiver domains: a transcription activation mechanism that is conserved in mesophilic and extremely hyperthermophilic bacteria. J. Mol. Biol. 353 (2005) 242-255
23. - activated SpoOF reveals the conformational switch in a phosphorelay system. J. Mol. Biol. 331 (2003) 245-254
24. Hastings C.A., Lee S.Y., Cho H.S., Yan D., Kustu S., and Wemmer D.E. High-resolution solution structure of the beryllofluoride-activated NtrC receiver domain. Biochemistry 42 (2003) 9081-9090
25. - selects between alternate dimeric states of the receiver domain. FASEB J. 10 (2002) 1096
26. Cho H.S., Pelton J.G., Yan D., Kustu S., and Wemmer D.E. Phosphoaspartates in bacterial signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11 (2001) 679-684
27. Bachhawat P., and Stock A.M. Crystal structures of the receiver domain of the response regulator PhoP from Escherichia coli in the absence and presence of the phosphoryl analog beryllofluoride. J. Bacteriol. 189 (2007) 5987-5995
28. Murshudov G.N., Vagin A.A., and Dodson E.J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 53 (1997) 240-255
29. Venien-Bryan C., Balavoine F., Toussaint B., Mioskowski C., Hewat E.A., Helme B., and Vignais P.M. Structural study of the response regulator HupR from Rhodobacter capsulatus. Electron microscopy of two-dimensional crystals on a nickel-chelating lipid. J. Mol. Biol. 274 (1997) 687-692
30. + domain. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 36 (2008) 89-93
31. + enhancer binding proteins in transcriptional activation. J. Struct. Biol 156 (2006) 190-199
32. Drummond M.H., Contreras A., and Mitchenall L.A. The function of isolated domains and chimeric proteins constructed from the transcriptional activators NifA and NtrC of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Mol. Microbiol. 4 (1990) 29-37
33. Weiss D.S., Batut J., Klose K.E., Keener J., and Kustu S. The phosphorylated form of the enhancer-binding protein NtrC has an ATPase activity that is essential for activation of transcription. Cell 67 (1991) 155-167
34. De Carlo S., Chen B., Hoover T.R., Kondrashkina E., Nogales E., and Nixon B.T. The structural basis for regulated assembly and function of the transcriptional activator NtrC. Genes Dev. 20 (2006) 1485-1495
35. Gardino A.K., and Kern D. Functional dynamics of response regulators using NMR relaxation techniques. Methods Enzymol. 423 (2007) 149-162
36. Kern D., Volkman B.F., Luginbuhl P., Nohaile M., Kustu S., and Wemmer D. Structure of a transiently phosphorylated switch in bacterial signal transduction. Nature 402 (1999) 898
37. Volkman B.F., Lipson D., Wemmer D., and Kern D. Two-state allosteric behaviour in a single-domain signaling protein. Science 291 (2001) 2429-2433
38. Huala E., Stigter J., and Ausubel F.M. The central domain of Rhizobium leguminosarum DctD functions independently to activate transcription. Bacteriology 174 (1992) 1428-1431
39. 54 dependent transcriptional activator, may be negatively controlled by a subdomain in the C-terminal end of its two-component receiver module. Mol. Microbiol. 13 (1994) 51-66
40. Park S., Zhang H., Jones A.D., and Nixon B.T. Biochemical evidence for multiple dimeric states of the Sinorhizobium meliloti DctD receiver domain. Biochemistry 41 (2002) 10934-10941
41. - bound receiver of DctD from Sinorhizobium meliloti. Biochemistry 44 (2005) 13962-13969
42. 5 face. J. Mol. Biol. 349 (2005) 11-26
43. Wisedchaisri G., Wu M., Sherman D.R., and Hol W.G. Crystal structures of the response regulator DosR from Mycobacterium tuberculosis suggest a helix rearrangement mechanism for phosphorylation activation. J. Mol. Biol. 378 (2008) 227-242
44. Feher V.A., and Cavanagh J. Millisecond-timescale motions contribute to the function of the bacterial response regulator protein SpoOF. Lett. Nat. 400 (1999) 289-293
45. Feher V.A., Zapf J.W., Hoch J.A., Whiteley J.M., McIntoch L.P., Rance M., et al. High-resolution NMR structure and backbone dynamics of the Bacillus subtilis response regulator SpoOF: implications for phosphorylation and molecular recognition. Biochemistry 36 (1997) 10015-10025
46. Chenna R., Sugawara H., Koike T., Lopez R., Gibson T.J., Higgins D.G., and Thompson J.D. Multiple sequence alignment with the CLUSTAL series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (2003) 3497-3500
47. CCP4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 50 (1994) 760-763
48. Evans P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 62 (2006) 72-82
49. Leslie A.G. The integration of macromolecular diffraction data. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 62 (2006) 48-57
50. Yeates T.O. Detecting and overcoming crystal twinning. Methods Enzymol. 276 (1997) 344-358
51. Sheldrick G.M. Macromolecular phasing with SHELXE. Z. Kristallogr. 217 (2002) 644-650
52. Bricogne G., Vonrhein C., Flensburg C., Schiltz M., and Paciorek W. Generation, representation and flow of phase information in structure determination: recent developments in and around SHARP 2.0. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 59 (2003) 2023-2030
53. McCoy A.J., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Adams P.D., Storoni L.C., and Read R.J. PHASER crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40 (2007) 658-674
54. Jones T.A., Zou J.Y., Cowan S.W., and Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 47 Pt 2 (1991) 110-119
55. Afonine P.V., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., and Adams P.D. PHENIX REFINE. CCP4 News 42 (2005) contribution 8
56. Painter J., and Merritt E.A. Optimal description of a protein structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TLS motion. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 62 (2006) 439-450
57. McRorie D.K., and Voelker P.J. Self-Associating Systems in the Analytical Ultracentrifuge (1993), Beckman, Fullerton, CA
58. Laue R.M., Shah B.D., Ridgeway T.M., and Pelletier S.L. Computer-aided interpretation of analytical sedimentation data for proteins. In: Harding S.E., Rowe A.J., and Horton J.C. (Eds). Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science. The Royal Society of Chemistry (1992), Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge