Hysteropexy: A review

Minerva Ginecologica

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 509-528

  Ridgeway, B ^a   Frick, A C ^a   Walter, M D ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Postoperative complications; Surgical procedures, operative; Uterine prolapse

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SACROCERVICOPEXY; BLEEDING; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; HYSTEROPEXY; LAPAROSCOPIC SACROHYSTEROPEXY; LAPAROSCOPIC UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT UTERINE SUSPENSION; LAPAROSCOPIC VENTROSUSPENSION; LAPAROSCOPY; MANCHESTER PROCEDURE; OPERATION DURATION; PELVIS SURGERY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SACROCERVICOPEXY; SACROSPINOUS HYSTEROPEXY; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; TRANSVAGINAL UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION; UTERUS PROLAPSE; VAGINAL APPROACH;

FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL MESH; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TIME FACTORS; UTERINE PROLAPSE; UTERUS;

EID: 57749171782     PISSN: 00264784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Falcone T and Walters MD. Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:753-67.
2. Conger GT and Keettel WC. The Manchester-Fothergill operation, its place in gynecology; a review of 960 cases at University Hospitals, Iowa City, Iowa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958;76:634-40.
3. Tipton RH, Atkin PF. Uterine disease after the Manchester repair operation. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1970;77:852-3.
4. Thomas AG, Brodman ML, Dottino PR, Bodian C, Friedman FJr, Bogursky E. Manchester procedure vs. vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse. A comparison. J Reprod Med 1995;40:299-304.
5. Williams BF. Surgical treatment for uterine prolapse in young women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966;95:967-71.
6. Richardson DA, Scotti RJ, Ostergard DR. Surgical management of uterine prolapse in young women. J Reprod Med 1989;34:388-92.
7. Kovac SR, Cruikshank SH. Successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries after sacrospinous uterosacral fixation in five of nineteen patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1778-83; discussion 1783-6.
8. Maher CF, Gary MP, Slack MC, Murray CJ, Milligan M, Schluter P. Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12:381-4; discussion 384-5.
9. Dietz V, de Jong J, Huisman M, Schraffordt Koops S, Heintz P, van der Vaart H. The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18:1271-6.
10. van Brummen HJ, van de Pol G, Aalders CI, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH. Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003;14:350-5; discussion 355.
11. Jeng CJ, Yang YC, Tzeng CR, Shen J, Wang LR. Sexual functioning after vaginal hysterectomy or transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension for uterine prolapse: a comparison. J Reprod Med 2005;50:669-74.
12. Lin TY, Su TH, Wang YL, Lee MY, Hsieh CH, Wang KG et al. Risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. J Formos Med Assoc 2005;104:249-53.
13. Dietz V, Huisman M, de Jong JM, Heintz PM, van der Vaart CH. Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:747-52.
14. Rabenau Fv. Ueber eine neue operative Behandlung der Retroflexio uteri. Berl. klin. Wehnschr 1886;23:232-4.
15. Duhrssen A. Ueber die operative Heilung der mobilen und fixirten Retroflexio uteri auf vaginalem Wege an der hand von 207 eigenen Operationsfallen, mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der Dauerfolge. Arch f Gynak 1894;47:284-448.
16. Freund WA. Abstract of report to Naturforscherversammlung in Frankfurt. M. Centralbl f Gynak 1896;20:1009-10.
17. Fritsch H. Prolapsoperation. Centralbl f Gynak 1900;24:49-53.
18. Wertheim E. Zur plastischen Verwendug des Uterus bei Prolapsen. Centralbl f Gynak 1899;23:369-72.
19. Watkins TJ. The treatment of cystocele and uterine prolapse after the menopause. Am. Gynaec Obst J 1899;15:420-3.
20. Diwan A, Rardin CR and Kohli N. Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004;15:286-92.
21. Skiadas CC, Goldstein DP and Laufer MR. The manchester-fothergill procedure as a fertility sparing alternative for pelvic organ prolapse in young women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2006;19:89-93.
22. Kovac SR and Cruikshank SH. Successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries after sacrospinous uterosacral fixation in five of nineteen patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1778-83.
23. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. 1996;175:10-7.
24. Maher CF, Cary MP, Slack MC, Murray CJ, Milligan M, Schluter P. Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12:381-4.
25. Neuman M, Lavy Y. Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18:889-93.
26. Gamble TL, Aschkenazi SO, Nguyen A et al. Bilateral, graft-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy: 1-year anatomic and functional outcomes following surgery for uterine preservation. J Pelvic Med Surg 2008;14:275.
27. Nesbitt RE, Jr. Uterine preservation in the surgical management of genuine stress urinary incontinence associated with uterovaginal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989;168:143-7.
28. Joshi VM. A new technique of uterine suspension to pectineal ligaments in the management of uterovaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:790-3.
29. Leron E, Stanton SL. Sacrohysteropexy with synthetic mesh for the management of uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG 2001;108:629-33.
30. Barranger E, Fritel X, Pigne A. Abdominal sacrohysteropexy in young women with uterovaginal prolapse: long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1245-50.
31. Costantini E, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A, Mearini E, Porena M. Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse. Eur Urol 2005;48:642-9.
32. Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Somunkiran A, Doyran GD, Alhan A, Gul B. Abdominal sacrohysteropexy in young women with uterovaginal prolapse: results of 20 cases. J Reprod Med 2006;51:539-43.
33. O'Brien PM, Ibrahim J. Failure of laparoscopic uterine suspension to provide a lasting cure for uterovaginal prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:707-8.
34. Wu MP. Laparoscopic uterine suspension for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;59:259-60.
35. Maher CF, Carey MP and Murray CJ. Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:1010-4.
36. Diwan A, Rardin CR, Strohsnitter WC, Weld A, Rosenblatt P, Kohli N. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006;17:79-83.
37. Krause HG, Goh JT, Sloane K, Higgs P, Carey MP. Laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006;17:378-81.
38. Medina C, Takacs P. Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: a minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:472-5.
39. Uccella S, Ghezzi F, Bergamini V, Serati M, Cromi A, Franchi M et al. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligaments plication for the treatment of uterine prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;276:225-9.
40. Cutner A, Kearney R, Vashisht A. Laparoscopic uterine sling suspension: a new technique of uterine suspension in women desiring surgical management of uterine prolapse with uterine conservation. BJOG 2007;114:1159-62.
41. Rosenblatt PL, Chelmow D, Ferzandi TR. Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse: a retrospective case series report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:268-72.
42. Stoesser FG. Construction of a sacrocervical ligament for uterine suspension. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1955;101:638-41.
43. Barranger E, Fritel X, Pigne A. Abdominal sacrohysteropexy in young women with uterovaginal prolapse: long-term follow-up. Am J Ostet Gynecol 2003;189:1245-50.
44. Walters MD. Uterovaginal prolapse in a woman desiring uterine preservation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:1465-70.
45. Lin LL, Ho MH, Haessler AL, Betson LH, Alinsod RM, Liu CY et al. A review of laparoscopic uterine suspension procedures for uterine preservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005;17:541-6.
46. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 388 November 2007; supracervical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1215-7.