Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: What comes next?

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 39-43

  Burke, F J T ^a   Lucarotti, P S K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NHS Business Services Authority (Dental Division)   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Glass ionomer; Re intervention; Restoration; Survival

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; DATA BASE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTISTRY; HUMAN; INCISOR; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RETREATMENT; STANDARD; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; CUSPID; DATABASES AS TOPIC; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ENGLAND; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INCISOR; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MOLAR; RETREATMENT; STATE DENTISTRY; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALES;

EID: 57749171393     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Wilson A.D., and Kent B.E. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. British Dental Journal 132 (1972) 133-135
2. Digest of statistics. Dental Practice Board, Eastbourne, UK; 2004.
3. Randall R.C., and Wilson N.H.F. Glass ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. Journal of Dental Research 78 (1999) 628-637
4. Combe E.C., Burke F.J.T., and Douglas W.H. Clinical dental materials (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers
5. Sidhu S.K., and Watson T.F. Resin modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. American Journal of Dentistry 8 (1995) 59-67
6. Kao E.C., Rezvan E., and Johnson W.M. Microhardness as an indicator for finishing time in ionomer restorations. Journal of Dental Research 73 (1994) 220, Abstract No. 945
7. Momoi Y., Hirosaki K., Kohno A., and McCabe J.F. In vitro toothbrush-dentrifice abrasion of resin-modified glass ionomers. Dental Materials (1997) 82-88
8. Dentsply De Trey GmbH Professional Research. Chemflex technical manual. Dentsply De Trey, Germany; 1998, p. 25.
9. www 3MESPE Ketac Molar Quick Product Brochure.
10. Buck D., and Newton J.T. The privatisation of NHS dentistry? A national snapshot of general dental practitioners. British Dental Journal 190 (2001) 115-118
11. Lucarotti P.S.K., Holder R.L., and Burke F.J.T. Analysis of an administrative database of half a million restorations over 11 years. Journal of Dentistry 33 (2005) 791-803
12. Lucarotti P.S.K., Holder R.L., and Burke F.J.T. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales. Part 1. Variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. Journal of Dentistry 33 (2005) 805-815
13. Strategic Dental Marketing, 340 West Passaic Street, 1st Floor Rochelle Park, NJ 07662, USA.
14. Robinson A.D. The life of a filling. British Dental Journal 130 (1971) 206-208
15. Burke F.J.T., Wilson N.H.F., Cheung S.-W., and Mjor I.A. Influence of method of funding on the age of failed restorations in general dental practice in the UK. British Dental Journal 192 (2002) 699-702
16. Hassan M.A., and Watson T.F. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. American Journal of Dentistry 11 (1998) 36-45