Comparison of multi-slice CT coronary artery imaging with coronary angiography

Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research

Volumn 12, Issue 44, 2008, Pages 8792-8796

  Zhao, Yan ^a   Wei, Jia Ping ^a   Hua, Qi ^a   Wang, Jia Rui ^a   He, Ji Fang ^a   Li, Jing ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CHINA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

EID: 57749170483     PISSN: 16738225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beck T, Burgstahler C, Reimann A, et al. Technology insight: possible applications of multislice computed tomography in clinical cardiology. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005;2(7):361-368
2. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(1):123-127
3. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(1):128-132
4. State Council of the People's Republic of China. Administrative Regulations on Medical Institution. 1994-09-01.
5. Gulati GS, Seth S, Kurian S, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease with 16-slice computed tomography. Natl Med J India 2005;18(5):236-241
6. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112(15):2318-2323
7. Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Palumbo A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low-to-intermediate risk. Radiol Med (Torino) 2007;112(7):969-981
8. Comparison of multi-slice spiral CT coronary angiography and quantitative coronary angiography. Fujian Yike Daxue Xuebao 2004;38(1):77-80
9. Lim MC, Wong TW, Yaneza LO, et al. Non-invasive detection of significant coronary artery disease with multi-section computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Clin Radiol 2006;61(2):174-180
10. Nieman K, Reusing BJ, van Geuns RJ, et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002;89(8):913-918
11. Choi HS, Choi BW, Choe KO, et al. Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi- detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics 2004;24(3):787-800
12. Nakanishi T, Kayashima Y, Inoue R, et al. Pitfalls in 16-detector row CT of the coronary arteries. Radiographics 2005;25(2):425-440
13. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Ear J Radiol 2008;66(2):134-141
14. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 2005;234(1):86-97
15. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F, et al. Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol 2006;41(5):436-442
16. Jonsdottir B, Danielsen R. Comparison between coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography and by cardiac catheterisation for assessing atherosclerotic lesions and stenosis. Laeknabladid 2006;92(1):27-32
17. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Fayad Z, et al. Task Force 12: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (computed tomography): endorsed by the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(4):915-920
18. Schussler JM, Grayburn PA. Non-invasive coronary angiography using multislice computed tomography. Heart 2007;93(3):290-297
19. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(22):2204-2210
20. Frazier AA, Qureshi F, Read KM, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment with multidetector CT in the early and late postoperative settings. Radiographics 2005;25(4):881-896
21. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 2007;115(13):1762-1768
22. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(8):863-871