Active learning for pipeline models

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 683-688

  Roth, Dan ^a   Small, Kevin ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LEARNINGS; ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES; COMPLEX APPLICATIONS; DATA REQUIREMENTS; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; LOCAL ACTIVES; MACHINE LEARNINGS; PIPELINE MODELS; RELATION EXTRACTIONS; SEQUENTIAL STAGES; SIGNIFICANT REDUCTIONS;

APPLICATIONS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIONICS; FORECASTING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PIPELINES;

EDUCATION;

EID: 57749169475     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Becker, M.; Hachey, B.; Alex, B.; and Grover, C. 2005. Optimising selective sampling for bootstrapping named entity recognition. In ICML Workshop on Multiple Views.
2. Chang, M.-W.; Do, Q.; and Roth, D. 2006. Multilingual dependency parsing: A pipeline approach. In Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 195-204.
3. Cohn, D. A.; Ghahramani, Z.; and Jordan, M. I. 1996. Active learning with statistical models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 4: 129-145.
4. Collins, M. 2002. Discriminative training methods for hidden markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In Proc. of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
5. Culotta, A., and McCallum, A. 2005. Reducing labeling effort for structured prediction tasks. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).
6. Donmez, P.; Carbonell, J. G.; and Bennett, P. N. 2007. Dual strategy active learning. In Proc. of the European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML).
7. Finkel, J. R.; Manning, C. D.; and Ng, A. Y. 2006. Solving the problem of cascading errors: Approximate bayesian inference for linguistic annotation pipelines. In Proc. of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
8. Jones, R. 2005. Learning to Extract Entities from Labeled and Unlabeled Text. Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon. Roth, D., and Small, K. 2006. Margin-based active learning for structured output spaces. In Proc. of the European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML).
9. Roth, D., and Yih, W.-T. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Proc. of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL).
10. Roth, D., and Yih, W.-T. 2007. Global inference for entity and relation identification via a linear programming formulation. In Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning.
11. Roy, N., and McCallum, A. 2001. Toward optimal active learning through sampling estimation of error reduction. In Proc. of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 441-448.
12. Shen, D.; Zhang, J.; Su, J.; Zhou, G.; and Tan, C.-L. 2004. Multi-criteria-based active learning for named entity recognition. In Proc. of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 589-596.
13. Thompson, C. A.; Califf, M. E.; and Mooney, R. J. 1999. Active learning for natural language parsing and information extraction. In Proc. of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 406-414.
14. Tong, S., and Roller, D. 2001. Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2: 45-66.