Symbolic interactionism and the concept of social structure

Sociological Focus

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 287-305

  Dennis, Alex ^a   Martin, Peter J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57749156730     PISSN: 00380237     EISSN: 21621128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00380237.2007.10571311     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abbott, A. 1997. “Of Space and Time: The Contemporary Relevance of the Chicago School.” Social Forces 75:1149-1182.
2. Abbott, A. and E. Gaziano. 1995. “Transition and Tradition: Departmental Faculty in the Era of the Second Chicago School.” Pp. 221 -272 in A Second Chicago School? The Development of a Postwar American Sociology, edited by G. A. Fine. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
3. Alexander, J. C. 1988. “Parsons’ ‘Structure’ in American Sociology.” Sociological Theory 6:96-102.
4. Alexander, J. C. and B. Giesen. 1987. “From Reduction to Linkage: The Long View of the Micro-Macro Link.” Pp. 1-42 in The Micro-Macro Link:Problems and Prospects, edited by J. C. Alexander, N. J. Smelser, and R. Munch. Berkeley:University of California Press.
5. Athens, L. 2005. “Mead’s Lost Conception of Society.” Symbolic Interaction 28:305-325.
6. Baldwin, J. D. 1986. George Herbert Mead: A Unifying Theory for Sociology. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
7. Becker, H. S. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Becker, H. S. 1999. “The Chicago School, So-Called.” Qualitative Sociology 22:3-12.
9. Berger, R and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York:Doubleday.
10. Blau, P. and O. Duncan. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.
11. Blumer, H. 1939. Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences: An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s “The Polish Peasant in Europe and America”. New York:Social Science Research Council.
12. Blumer, H. 1954. “What Is Wrong with Social Theory?” American Sociological Review 19:3-10.
13. Blumer, H. 1956. “Sociological Analysis and the ‘Variable.’” American Sociological Review 21:683-690.
14. Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
15. Blumer, H. 1981. “Review of David L. Miller’s George Herbert Mead: Self, Language, and the World.” American Journal of Sociology 86:902-904.
16. Blumer, H. 1990. Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
17. Blumer, H. 2004. George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
18. Bowles, S. and H. Gintis. 1976. Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York:BasicBooks.
19. Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York:Monthly Review Press.
20. Cicourel, A. V. 1964. Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: Free Press.
21. Coser, L. A. 1976. “Sociological Theory from the Chicago Dominance to 1965.” Annual Review of Sociology 2:145-160.
22. Crompton, R. 1993. Class and Stratijication: An Introduction to Current Debates. Cambridge, UK:Polity.
23. Dennis, A. and P. J. Martin. 2005. “Symbolic Interactionism and the Concept of Power.” British Journal of Sociology 56:191-213.
24. Denzin, N. K. 1992. Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies: The Politics of Interpretation. Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
25. Durkheim, E. 1982 [1895]. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. London: Macmillan.
26. Durkheim, E. 2006 [1897]. On Suicide. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
27. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Garnsey, E. 1978. “Womens Work and Theories of Class Stratification.” Sociology 12:223-243.
29. Giddens, A. 1981. The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. London: Hutchinson.
30. Goldthorpe, J. H. 1980. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
31. Gouldner, A. W. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: BasicBooks.
32. Hall, P. M. 2003. “Interactionism, Social Organization, and Social Processes: Looking Back and Moving Ahead.” Symbolic Interaction 26:33-55.
33. Hughes, E. C. 1951. “Mistakes at Work.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 17:320-327.
34. Hughes, E. C. 1962. “Good People and Dirty Work.” Social Problems 10:3-11.
35. Jenkins, R. 2002. Foundations of Sociology: Towards a Better Understanding of the Human World. London:Palgrave Macmillan.
36. Katovich, M. A. and W. A. Reese. 1993. “Postmodern Thought in Symbolic Interaction: Reconstructing Social Inquiry in Light of Late-Modern Concerns.” Sociological Quarterly 34:391-411.
37. Lichtman, R. 1970. “Symbolic Interactionism and Social Reality: Some Marxist Queries.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 15:75-94.
38. Maines, D. R. 1977. “Social Organization and Social Structure in Symbolic Interactionist Thought.” Annual Review of Sociology 3:235-259.
39. Maines, D. R. 2001. The Faultline ofConsciousness: A View of Interactionism in Sociology. New York:Aldine de Gruyter.
40. Martin, P. J. 1984. “Social Stratification.” Pp. 20-42 in Applied Sociological Perspectives, edited by R. J. Anderson and W. W. Sharrock. London: Allen and Unwin.
41. Martin, P. J. 1987. “The Concept of Class.” Pp. 67-96 in Classic Disputes in Sociology, edited by R. J. Anderson, J. A. Hughes, and W. W. Sharrock. London: Allen and Unwin.
42. Martin, P. J. 2004. “Culture, Subculture, and Social Organisation.” Pp. 21-35 in After Subculture, edited by A. Bennett and K. Kahn-Harris. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
43. Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44. Meltzer, B. N., J. W. Petras, and L. T. Reynolds. 1975. Symbolic Interactionism: Genesis, Varieties, and Criticism. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
45. Mills, C. W. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Morrione, T. J. 2003. “Preface.” Pp. ix-xvii in H. Blumer, George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct, edited and introduced by T. J. Morrione. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
47. Musolf, G. R. 1992. “Structure, Institutions, Power, and Ideology: New Directions within Symbolic Interactionism.” Sociological Quarterly 33:171-189.
48. Park, R. E. and E. Burgess. 1921. Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49. Poulantzas, N. 1975 [1973]. Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: New Left Books.
50. Sauder, M. 2005. “Symbols and Contexts: An Interactionist Approach to the Study of Social Status.” Sociological Quarterly 46:279-298.
51. Scheff, T. J. 1995. “Academic Gangs.” Crime, Law, and Social Change 23:157-162.
52. Schütz, A. 1962 [1953]. “Commonsense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” Pp. 3-47 in Collected Papers: The Problem of Social Reality, Volume I. The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.
53. Stewart, A., K. Prandy, and R. M. Blackburn. 1980. Social Stratification and Occupations. London: Macmillan.
54. Strauss, A. L. 1978. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
55. Strauss, A. L., L. Schatzman, R. Bucher, D. Ehrlich, and M. Sabshin. 1964. Psychiatric Ideologies and Institutions. New York: Free Press.
56. Watson, D. R. 1995. “Some Potentialities and Pitfalls in the Analysis of Process and Personal Change in Counseling and Therapeutic Intervention.” Pp. 301-335 in Professional and Everyday Discourse as Behavior Change, edited by Jiirg Siegfried. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
57. Weber, M. 1948 [1924], “Class, Status, Party.” Pp. 180-195 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by H. Gerth and C. W. Mills. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
58. Weber, M. 1978 [1914], Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
59. Whitehead, A. N. 1925. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Natural Knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60. Wirth, L. 1928. The Ghetto. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61. Wright, E. O. 1978. Class, Crisis, and the State. London: New Left Books.
62. Wright, E. O. 1985. Classes. London: Verso.