Sports Talk: How Gender Shapes Discursive Framing of Title IX

Politics and Gender

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 65-92

  Rosenthal, Cindy Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57749135605     PISSN: 1743923X     EISSN: 17439248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X08000032     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arnold Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
2. Baumgartner Frank, and Jones Bryan. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Boutilier Mary A., and San Giovanni Lucinda F. 1983. The Sporting Woman. Champaign-Urbana, IL: Human Kinetics, 100–101.
4. Boutilier Mary A., and San Giovanni. Lucinda F. 1994. “Politics, Public Policy and Title IX.” In Women, Sport and Culture, ed. Birrell and Cole, Human Kinetics Publishing.
5. Brake Deborah. 2001. “The Struggle for Sex Equality in Sport and the Theory Behind Title IX.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 34 (Fall–Winter): 13–149.
6. Cobb Roger W., and Ross Mark Howard. 1997. Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
7. Department of Education, Secretary of Education's Commission on Opportunity in Athletics. 2002. Official Transcripts of Town Hall Meetings: Atlanta (August 27, 2002), Chicago (September 17, 2002), Colorado Springs (October 22, 2002), and San Diego (November 20, 2002).
8. Department of Education, Secretary of Education's Commission on Opportunity in Athletics. 2003. “Open to All: Title IX at Thirty.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov/inits/commissionsboards/athletics/ (March 1, 2003).
9. de Varona Donna and Foudy Julie. 2003. “Minority Views on the Report of the Commission on Opportunity in Athletics” Washington, DC National Women's Law Center. http://www.nwlc.org/pdf/MinorityReportFeb26.pdf (June 20, 2003).
10. Edelman Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
11. Ferree Myra Marx, Gamson William A., Gerhards Jurgen, and Rucht Dieter. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Fischer Frank. 1995. Evaluating Public Policy, Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
13. Gamson William A., Croteau David, Hoynes William, and Sasson Theodore. 1992. “Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality,” Annual Review of Sociology 18: 373–93.
14. Gelb Joyce, and Palley Marian. 1987. Women and Public Policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2001. “Intercollegiate Athletics: Four_Year Colleges' Experiences Adding and Discontinuing Teams.” Washington D.C.: GAO_01_297.
16. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2000. “Gender Equity: Men's and Women's Participation in Higher Education.” Washington D.C.: GAO_01_128.
17. Greenberg Anna. 2003. “RE: Title IX Public Polling Data.” Washington, DC: Greenberg, Quinlan, Rosner Research Inc. Typescript memorandum.
18. Haltom William, and Michael McCann. 2004. Distorting the Law: Politics, Media and the Litigation Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Independent Women's Forum. 2003. “Time Out for Fairness: Women for Title IX Reform.” Washington, DC.
20. Kahn Kim Fridkin. 1994. “The Distorted Mirror: Press Coverage of Women Candidates for Statewide Office.” Journal of Politics 56 (1): 154–73.
21. Kenney Sally. 2003. “Where Is Gender in Agenda Setting?” Women & Politics 25 (1): 179–204.
22. Kimmel Michael. 1996. Manhood in America. New York: The Free Press.
23. Kingdon John W. 1994. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.
24. Krippendorff Klaus. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Messner Michael A. 1992. Power at Play: Sports and the Problem of Masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.
26. Naples Nancy A. 1997. “The ‘New Consensus’ on the Gendered ‘Social Contract’: The 1987–1988 U.S. Congressional Hearings on Welfare Reform.” Signs 22 (4): 907–45.
27. National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education (NCWGE). 2002. “Title IX at 30: Report Card on Gender Equity.” Washington, DC. http://www.ncwge.org/title9at30.pdf (March 20, 2003).
28. Norris Pippa, ed. 1997. Politics and the Press: The News Media and Their Influences. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
29. Sabo Don, and Grant Christine H. B. 2005. Limitations of the Department of Education's Online Survey Method for Measuring Athletic Interest and Ability on U.S.A. Campuses. Buffalo: Center for Research on Physical Activity, Sport & Health, D'Youville College.
30. Sabo Donald and Runfola Ross. 1980. Jock: Sports and Male Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31. Save Title IX. 2003. “What's at Stake: Title IX Policies Are in Grave Danger.” Washington, DC. http://www.savetitleix.com/stake.html (June 20, 2003).
32. Schattschneider E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
33. Stone Deborah. 1997. Policy Paradox. New York: W. W. Norton.
34. Strauss Anselm, and Corbin Juliet. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35. Terkildsen Nayda, Schnell Frauke I., and Ling Cristina. 1998. “Interest Groups, the Media, and Policy Debate Formation: An Analysis of Message Structure, Rhetoric, and Source Cues.” Political Communication 15 (1): 45–61.