An integrated reasoning approach to moral decision-making

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 1280-1286

  Dehghani, Morteza ^a   Tomai, Emmett ^a   Forbus, Ken ^a   Klenk, Matthew ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIONICS;

ANALOGICAL REASONINGS; COMPUTATIONAL MODELS; CONTEXTUAL FACTORS; CURRENT THEORIES; FORMAL REPRESENTATIONS; MORAL JUDGMENTS; NATURAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS; QUALITATIVE REASONINGS; REASONING APPROACHES; TAILORABILITY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 57749120353     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Allen, J. F. 1995. Natural Language Understanding. (2nd ed). Redwood City, CA.: Benjamin/Cummings.
2. Anderson, M., Anderson, S., and Armen, C. 2006. An Approach to Computing Ethics. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 21(4): 56-63
3. Baron, J., and Spranca, M. 1997. Protected Values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70:1-16.
4. Dauge, P. 1993. Numeric Reasoning with Relative Orders of Magnitude. In Proceedings of QR93.
5. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. and Gentner, D. 1989. The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithms and Examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41: 1-63.
6. Forbus, K., Gentner, D. and Law, K. 1995. MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-based Retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19(2), 141-205.
7. Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy. Cognitive Science, 7: 155-170.
8. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structural alignment in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45-56.
9. Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
10. Kuehne, S. and Forbus, K. 2004. Capturing QP-Relevant Information from Natural Language Text. Proceedings of QR04.
11. Lim, C. S. and Baron, J. (1997), Protected values in Malaysia Singapore, and the United States. Manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Pennyslvania.
12. Markman, A and Medin, D.L. 2002. Decision Making. Stevens Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 3rd edition: Volume 2, Memory and Cognitive Processes. New York: Wiley.
13. Macleod, C., Grishman, R., and Meyers, A. 1998. COMLEX Syntax Reference Manual. Version 3.0. Linguistic Data Consortium. University of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia, PA.
14. McLaren, B. 2005. Lessons in Machine Ethics from the Perspective of Two Computational Models. In Anderson, M. et al. (Eds.) Machine ethics: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium, Technical Report FS-05-06. Menlo Park, CA.
15. Ritov, I. and Baron, J. 1999. Protected Values and Omission Bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(2): 79-94.
16. Subrahmanian, VS., Albanese, M., Martinez, V., Nau, D., Reforgiato, D., Simari, G., Sliva, A., and Wllkenfeld, J. 2007. CARA: A Cultural Adversarial Reasoning Architecture. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 22(2): 12-16.
17. Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the ideological beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 293-326.
18. Waldmann, M. R., and Dieterich, J. 2007. Throwing a Bomb on a Person Versus Throwing a Person on a Bomb: Intervention Myopia in Moral Intuitions. Psychological Science, 18 (3), 247-253.
19. Winston, P.H. 1982. Learning New Principles from Precedents and Exercises. Artificial Intelligence 19(3), 321-350.