Mirena® coil for heavy menstrual bleeding

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 58, Issue 557, 2008, Pages 886-

  Prileszky, Gail ^a   Kai, Joe ^a   Gupta, Janesh ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEVONORGESTREL;

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEAVY MENSTRUAL BLEEDING; HUMAN; LETTER; MENORRHAGIA; MENSTRUATION DISORDER; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; NOTE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, MEDICATED; LEVONORGESTREL; MENORRHAGIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 57749098465     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp08X376212     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Santer M. Heavy menstrual bleeding: delivering patient-centred care. Br J Gen Pract 2008; 58(548): 151-152.
2. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Heavy menstrual bleeding. NICE clinical guideline 44. London: NICE, 2007.
3. O'Flynn N, Britten N. Diagnosing menstrual disorders: a qualitative study of the approach of primary care professionals. Br J Gen Pract 2004; 54(502): 353-358.
4. Warner P, Critchley HOD, Lumsden M-A. Menorrhagia: is the 80ml blood loss criterion useful in management of complaint of menorrhagia? Am J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 190: 1224-1229.