Modeling chlorobenzene leaching from a landfill into a soil environment using particle filter approach

Journal of Environmental Informatics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 88-95

  Chang, S Y ^a   Li, X P ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA A AND T STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Landfill leachate; Particle filter; State estimation; State space model; Subsurface transport model

Indexed keywords

ADVECTION; AQUIFER POLLUTION; CHLOROBENZENE; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; FILTER; GAUSSIAN METHOD; LANDFILL; LEACHING; NUMERICAL METHOD; SOIL POLLUTION; SUBSURFACE FLOW; SURFACE WATER;

EID: 57649238164     PISSN: 17262135     EISSN: 16848799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3808/jei.200800127     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arulampalam, M., Maskell, S., Gordon, N. and Clapp, T. (2002). A tutorial on particle filters for on-line non-linear/non-gaussian Bayesian tracking, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50, 174-188.
2. Beck, M.B. and Young, P.C. (1976). Systematic identification of DO-BOD model structure, J. Env. Eng. Div., 102, 909-924.
3. Bowles, D.S. and Greney, W.J. (1978). Steady state river quality modeling by sequential extended Kalman filters, Water Resour. Res.,12, 3281-3291.
4. Chang, S.Y. and Jin, A. (2005). Kalman filtering with regionalnoise to improve accuracy of contaminant transport models, J. Environ. Eng., 131, 971-982, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:6(971).
5. Chen, T., Julian, M. and Elaine, M. (2005). Particle filters for state and parameter estimation in batch processes, Journal of process control, 15, 665-673, doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2005.01.001.
6. Cheng, X. (2000). Kalman filter scheme for three-dimensional subsurface transport simulation with a continuous input, MS Thesis, Civil Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, USA.
7. Ching, J., Beck, J.L. and Porter, K.A. (2006). Bayesian state and parameter estimation of uncertain dynamical systems, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 21, 81-96, doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.08.003.
8. Cosby, B.J., Hornberger, G.M. and Kelly M.G. (1984). Identification of photosynthesis-light models for aquatic systems II: Application to a macrophyte dominated stream, Ecological Modelling, 23, 25-51, doi:10.1016/0304- 3800(84)90117-0.
9. Doucet, A., de Freitas, J.F.G. and Gordon, N. (2000). Introduction to sequential monte carlo methods, Sequential monte carlo methods in practice, Springer, Berlin, 7-15.
10. Fernandes, L., Warith, M.A. and Forge F.La. (1996). Modelling of contaminant transport within a marshland Environment, Waste Manage., 16, 649-661, doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(97)00006-8.
11. Ferraresi, M. and Marinelli, A. (1996). An extended formulation of the integrated finite difference method for groundwater flow and transport, J. of Hydrol., 175, 453-471, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694 (96)80020-5.
12. Ghil, M., Cohn, S.E., Tavantzis, J., Bube, K. and Isaacson, E. (1981). Applications of estimation theory to numerical weather prediction, Dynamic meteorology: Data assimilation methods, Bengtsson, L., Ghil, M. and Kallen, E. eds., Springer, New York, 139-224.
13. Gordon, N.J., Salmond, D.J. and Smith, A.F.M. (1993). Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation, IEE proc., 140(2), 107-113.
14. Gustafsson, N. (1981). A review of methods for objective analysis, Dynamic Meteorology: Data Assimilation Methods, Applied Mathematical Sciences, L. Bengtsson, M. Ghil and E. Kallen, Eds., Springer Verlag, New York, 17-76.
15. Harrouni, K.E., Ouazar, D., Wrobel, L.C. and Cheng, A.H.D. (1997). Aquifer parameter estimation by extended kalman filtering and boundary elements, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 19(3), 231-237, doi:10.1016/S0955-7997(97)00008-8.
16. Houtekamer, P.L. and Michell, H.L. (1998). Data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter technique, Mon. Weather. Rev., 126, 796-811.
17. Kalman, R.E. and Bucy, R.S. (1961). New results in linear filtering and prediction theory, J. Basic Eng., 83, 95-108.
18. Kitagawa, G. (1996). Monte carlo filter and smoother for non- Gaussian nonlinear state space models, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 5, 1-25.
19. McLaughlin, D. (2002). An integrated approach to hydrologic data assimilation: interpolation, smoothing and forecasting, Adv. Water Resour., 25, 1275-1286, doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00055-6.
20. Porter, D., Bruce, G., Jones, W., Huyakorn, P., Hamm, L. and Flach, G. (2000). Data fusion modeling for groundwater systems, J. Contam. Hydrol., 43, 303-335, doi:10.1016/S0169-7722(99)00081-9.
21. Svetlana, N.L., Kivman, G.A., Schroter, J. and Wenzel, M. (2003). Sequential weak constraint parameter estimation in an ecosystem model, J. Mar. Syst., 43, 31-49, doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2003.06.001.
22. Van Geer, F.C. (1982). An equation based theoretical approach to network design for groundwater levels using Kalman filters, Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci., 136, 241-250.
23. Whitehead, P.G. and Hornberger, G.M. (1984). Modelling Algal behavior in the river thames, Water Res., 18(8), 945-953, doi:10.1016/0043-1354(84) 90244-6.
24. Yu, Y.S., Heidari, M. and Guang-Te, W. (1989). Optimal estimation of contaminant transport in ground water, Water Resources Bulletin, 25, 295-300.
25. Zhou, Y.X., Te Stroet, C.B.M. and Van Geer, F.C. (1991) .Using Kalman filtering to improve and quantify the uncertainty of numerical groundwater simulations: 2. application to monitoring network design, Water Rsour. Res., 17(8), 1995-2006.