Knowledge in the head and on the Web: Using topic expertise to aid search

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 39-48

  Duggan, Geoffrey B ^a   Payne, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Domain knowledge; Expertise; Information scent; Navigation; Query formulation; Web search

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; EXPERTISE; INFORMATION SCENT; QUERY FORMULATION; WEB SEARCH;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NAVIGATION; PROGRAMMING THEORY; SEARCH ENGINES;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 57649210490     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357062     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bhavnani, S.K. (2001). Important Cognitive Components of Domain-Specific Search Knowledge. Proceedings of TREC'2001, 571-578.
2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd Edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Fu, W.-T., Pirolli, P. (in press), SNIF-ACT: A Model of Information-Seeking Behavior in the World Wide Web. Human-Computer Interaction.
4. Greenfield, S. (2003). How tomorrow's technology is changing the way we think and feel. London, Penguin.
5. Hembrooke, H.A., Gay, G.K., Granka, L.A. (2005), "The effects of expertise and feedback on search term selection and subsequent learning", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(8), 861-71.
6. Hölscher, C., & G. Strube. (2000). Web search behavior of internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks, 33(1), 337-346.
7. Hsieh-Yee, I. (1993). Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 44(3), 161-174. '
8. James, C. Helplessly advanced. On clever machines. http://www.clivejames. com/point-of-view/helplesslyadvanced.
9. Jansen, B.J., & Pooch, U. (2000). A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 235-246.
10. Jansen, B.J., & Spink, A. (2003). An analysis of Web documents retrieved and viewed. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Internet Computing. 65-69, Las Vegas, NV.
11. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kuhlthau, Carol C. (1991). Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42, 361-371.
13. Lazonder, A., Bieiemans, H., & Wopereis, I. (2002). Differences between novice and experienced users in searching for information on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 576-581.
14. MacCallum, R.C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K.J., & Rucker, D.D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40.
15. Marchionini, G. (1997). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
16. Mat-Hassan, M., & Levene, M. (2005). Associating search and navigation behavior through log analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 913-934.
17. Payne, S. J., Duggan, G. B., & Neth, H. (2007). Discretionary task interleaving: Heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 370-388.
18. Sellen, A.J., Murphy, R., & Shaw, K.L. (2002). How knowledge workers use the Web. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 227-234, Minneapolis, MN.
19. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd Edition). Cambridge, MA: Harper & Row.
20. Wildemuth, B. M. (2003). The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 55, 246-258.