Choice: Abdicating or exercising

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 715-724

  Leong, Tuck Wah ^a   Howard, Steve ^a   Vetere, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Abdicating choice; iPod; Non instrumental needs; Randomness; Shuffle listening; User experience

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; LIBRARIES;

ABDICATING CHOICE; IPOD; NON-INSTRUMENTAL NEEDS; RANDOMNESS; SHUFFLE LISTENING; USER EXPERIENCE;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 57649202122     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357168     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Alaszewski A, Using diaries for social research. Sage: London, 2006
2. Baeza-Yates R and Ribeiro-Neto B, Modern information retrieval. Addison-Wesley Harlow, England, 1999
3. Bell G, Blythe M, and Sengers P. Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 2005; 12(2): 149-173.
4. Botti S and Iyengar SS. The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004; 87(3): 312-326.
5. Crawford L. Viktor Shklovskij: differance in defamiliarization. Comparative Literature 1984; 36(3): 209-219.
6. DeNora T. Music and emotion in real time, in: O'Hara K and Brown B (Eds). Consuming music together: Social and collaborative aspects of music consumption technologies. Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands. 2006. 19-33.
7. Fishburn P. Decision theory: the next 100 years? The Economic Journal 1991; 101(404): 27-32.
8. Gaver W, Beaver J, and Benford S. Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc SIGCHI Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press. 2003. 233-240.
9. Hassenzahl M. The Thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product, in: Blythe MA, et al. (Eds). Funology: From usability to enjoyment. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands. 2003.
10. Hassenzahl M and Tractinsky N. User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology 2006; 25(2): 91-97.
11. IDEO. Tech Box for IDEO 2006, 1st September http://www.ideo.com/ portfolio/re.asp?x=50035
12. Lee JH and Downie JS. Survey of music information needs, uses, and seeking behaviours: preliminary findings. 5th Int Conf Music Information Retrieval 2004.
13. Leong TW, Vetere F, and Howard S. The serendipity shuffle. Proc 19th CHISIG (OZCHI) of Australia 2005; 1-4.
14. Leong TW, Vetere F, and Howard S. Randomness as a resource for design. Proc 6th DIS 2006, ACM Press; 132-139.
15. Lieberman H. Autonomous interface agents. Proc SIGCHI Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press. 1997. 67-74.
16. McCarthy J and Wright P, Technology as experience. MIT Press: Cambridge, 2004
17. McCarthy J, et al. The experience of enchantment in human-computer interaction. Pers Ubiquit Comput 2006; 10(369-378).
18. Merton RK and Barber E, The travels and adventures of serendipity. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 2004
19. Neuman WL, Social research methods - qualitative and quantitative approaches. 5 ed. Allyn and Bacon: Boston, 2003
20. Schwartz B, The paradox of choice: why more is less. ECCO: New York, 2004
21. Shklovsky V. Art as technique, in: Davis RC (Ed). Contemporary literary criticism. Modernism through poststructuralism. Longman: New York. 1917.
22. Strauss A, Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press: New York, 1987
23. Van Dijck J. From shoebox to performative agent: the computer as a personal memory machine. New media & Society 2005; 7(3): 311-322.
24. Van Dijck J, Mediated memories in the digital age. Stanford University Press: California, 2007
25. Vignoli F. Digital music interaction concepts: a user study. 5 th Int Conf Music Information Retrieval 2004.
26. Warde A. Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture 2005; 5(2): 131-153.