![]() |
Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1430-1433
|
Comparison of three spike detectors dedicated to single unit action potentials of the auditory nerve
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BANDPASS FILTERS;
BIOSENSORS;
MEDICAL PROBLEMS;
PROBABILITY;
SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;
AUDITORY NERVES;
FALSE DETECTION;
REAL DATA;
SPIKE DETECTORS;
BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS;
ACTION POTENTIAL;
ALGORITHM;
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION;
COCHLEAR NERVE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS;
ELECTRODIAGNOSIS;
EVALUATION STUDY;
EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE;
GUINEA PIG;
METHODOLOGY;
PHYSIOLOGY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ACTION POTENTIALS;
ALGORITHMS;
ANIMALS;
COCHLEAR NERVE;
DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
ELECTRODIAGNOSIS;
EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY;
GUINEA PIGS;
PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 57649187222
PISSN: 05891019
EISSN: None
Source Type: Conference Proceeding
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352568 Document Type: Conference Paper |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (9)
|