Graffiti vs. Unistrokes: An empirical comparison

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 305-308

  Castellucci, Steven J ^a   MacKenzie, I Scott ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Empirical study; Graffiti; Stylus; Text entry; Unistrokes

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL STUDY; GRAFFITI; STYLUS; TEXT ENTRY; UNISTROKES;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 57649178620     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357106     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Cao, X. and Zhai, S. Modeling human performance of pen stroke gestures. In Proc. CHI '07, ACM Press, (2007), 1495-1504.
2. Goldberg, D. and Richardson, C. Touch-typing with a stylus. In Proc. Interact '93 and CHI '93, ACM Press, (1993), 80-87.
3. MacKenzie, I. S., Chen, J. and Oniszczak, A. Unipad: Single stroke text entry with language-based acceleration. In Proc. NordiCHI '06, ACM Press (2006), 78-85.
4. MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W., Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. Ext. Abstracts CHI '03, ACM Press (2003), 754-755.
5. MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W. Text entry for mobile computing: Models and methods, theory and practice. In MacKenzie, I. S. ed., Human-computer interaction (2002), 147-198.
6. MacKenzie, I. S. and Zhang, S. X. The immediate usability of graffiti. In Proc. GI '97, Canadian Information Processing Society (1997), 129-137.
7. Stroop, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18. 643-662.
8. Yamada, H. A historical study of typewriters and typing methods: From the position of planning japanese parallels. Journal of Information Processing, 2 (4). 175-202.