Comments on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling

Test

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 450-455

  Sarkar, Sanat K ^a   Heller, Ruth ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57649176822     PISSN: 11330686     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11749-008-0129-3     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Y Benjamini AM Krieger D Yekutieli 2006 Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate Biometrika 93 3 491 507
2. Gavrilov Y, Benjamini Y, Sarkar SK (2008) An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control. Ann Stat (in press)
3. Dudoit S, van der Laan MJ (2008) Multiple testing procedures with applications to genomics. Springer series in statistics. Springer, New York
4. Dudoit S, van der Laan MJ, Birkner MD (2004) Multiple testing procedures for controlling tail probability error rates. Tech report, UC Berkeley division of biostatistics working paper series. Working paper 166. Available in http://www.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper166
5. M Pacifico C Genovese I Verdinelli L Wasserman 2004 False discovery control for random fields J Am Stat Assoc 99 1002 1014
6. SK Sarkar 2002 Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures Ann Stat 30 1 239 257
7. Sarkar SK (2008) On methods controlling the false discovery rate. Unpublished manuscript
8. JF Troendle 2000 Stepwise normal theory test procedures controlling the false discovery rate J Stat Plann Inference 84 1 139 158
9. MJ van der Laan S Dudoit KS Pollard 2004 Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3 15