Observing presenters' use of visual aids to inform the design of classroom presentation software

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 695-704

  Lanir, Joel ^a   Booth, Kellogg S ^a   Findlater, Leah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

High resolution displays; Multi screen displays; Visual aids

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; SCHOOL BUILDINGS;

CLASSROOM PRESENTATIONS; CONFERENCE ROOMS; CURRENT PRACTICES; DATA PROJECTORS; DESIGN GUIDELINES; HIGH RESOLUTION DISPLAYS; MULTI-SCREEN DISPLAYS; MULTIPLE DISPLAYS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES; PRESENTATION TOOLS; REAL ESTATES; SCREEN RESOLUTIONS; SINGLE MEDIUMS; VISUAL AIDS; WHITE BOARDS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 57649176512     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357165     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Abowd, G., Classroom 2000: An experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. IBM Systems Journal, 38, 4 (1999).
2. Anderson, R. J., Hoyer, C., Wolfman, S., and Anderson, R. A study of digital ink in lecture presentation. Proc. CHI (2004) 567-574.
3. Buxton, W. A. S. Mountains, exploration, education, rich media and design. e-presence web archive. http://epresence.tv/mediacontent/archives/2004- dec9/?archivel D=110
4. Chiu P, Liu O, Boreczky J, Foote J, Fuse T, Kimber D, Lertsithichai S, Liao C. Manipulating and annotating slides in a multi-display environment. Proc. of INTERACT '03, (2003) 583-590.
5. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J.P., and Wenk, L. Classtalk: A Classroom Communication System for Active Learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 3-47, (1996).
6. Daniels, L. Introducing technology in the classroom: PowerPoint as a first step. J. of Computing in Higher Education, 10, 2 (1999) 42-56.
7. Friedland, G., Knipping, L., Schulte, J., Tapia, E. E- Chalk: A lecture recording system using the chalkboard metaphor. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 1 (2004) 9-20
8. Glover, D., Miller, D., Averts, D., Door, V. The Interactive Whiteboard: a literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 14:2 (2005) 106-113.
9. Good, L., Bederson, B. Zoomable User interfaces as a medium for slide show presentations. Information Visualization 1:1 (2002) Palgrave Macmillan, 35-49.
10. Holman, D., Stojadinovi'c, P., Karrer, T., and Borchers. J. Fly: an organic presentation tool. Extended Abstracts CHI (2006), 863-868.
11. Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu J., Glaser, D., Tarshish O., and Canny. J. Livenotes: A system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. Proc. CHI 2005(2005) 531-540.
12. Kjeldsen J., The rhetoric of powerpoint. Seminar.net - Media, Technology and lifelong learning 3:1 (2007)
13. Lanir, J., Booth, K. S., Understanding instructors' use of visual aids in classroom setting. Proceedings of ED-Media, AACE (2007), 788-794
14. Levasseur D. G., Sawyer K. J. Pedagogy meets PowerPoint: A research review of the effects of computer-generated slides in the classroom. The Review of Communication 6:1-2 (2006) 101-123
15. Meyer, R.E., Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 2003
16. Meyer, R.E. and Moreno R. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist 38, 1, (2003), 43-52
17. MIT Open Courseware. http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/index.htm
18. Myers, B. Using handhelds and PCs together. CACM, 44:11 (2001), 34-41.
19. Nelson, L. S., Ichimura, E. R., Pedersen, and Adams. L., Palette: A paper interface for giving presentations. Proc CHI 1999(1999), 354-361.
20. Norman D. In defense of PowerPoint. (2004). http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/in- defense-of-p.html
21. Parker I. Absolute PowerPoint. The New Yorker, 77, 13 (2001) 76-87.
22. Ratto, M., Shapiro, R. B., Truong, T. M., and Griswold, W. G. The activeclass project: Experiments in encouraging classroom participation. In proc. CSCL (2003)
23. Röüling G, Trompler C., Mühlhäuser M, Köbler S, Wolf S, Enhancing classroom lectures with digital sliding blackboards, Proc. of SIGCSE (2004), 218-222
24. Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K., Miller, J. Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21:2 (2005), 91-101.
25. Sweller, J., Cognitive load during problem solving:, Cognitive Science, 12 (1988), 257-285.
26. Szabo, A., Hastings, J. Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers and Education, 35 (2000), 175-187
27. Tufte E. The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 2003