How people find videos

Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 201-210

  Cunningham, Sally Jo ^a   Nichols, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Qualitative research; User study; Video retrieval

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL LIBRARIES; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; LIBRARIES;

ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDIES; NEW ZEALAND; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RICH PICTURES; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS; USER STUDY; VIDEO INFORMATIONS; VIDEO RETRIEVAL;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 57649171114     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1378889.1378924     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bates, M.J. 1989. The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the Online Search Interface. Online Review, 13(5): 407-424.
2. Christel, M.G. and Conescu, R.M. 2005. Addressing the challenge of visual information access from digital image and video libraries. Proc. of JCDL '05, 69-78.
3. Cheng, X., Dale, C., and Liu, J. 2007. Understanding the characteristics of internet short video sharing: YouTube as a case study. Procs of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, San Diego (CA, USA), 15 - 28.
4. Crawford, L. 1996. Personal ethnography. Communication Monographs 63/2, 158-170.
5. th New Zealand Int. Conf on Computer-Human Interaction, 1-8.
6. Geisler, G., and Burns, S. 2007. Tagging video: Conventions and strategies of the YouTube community. Proc. of JCDL '07, Vancouver (BC, Canada), 480.
7. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago University Press.
8. Goodrum, A. 2003. If it sounds as good as it looks: Lessons learned from video retrieval evaluation. SIGIR 2003 Workshop on the Evaluation of Music Information Retrieval (MIR) Systems. http://www.musicir.org/evaluation/wp3/ wp3-goodrum-if.pdf
9. Halvey, M. J. and Keane, M. T. 2007. Analysis of online video search and sharing. Procs. of the 18th Conf. on Hypertext and Hypermedia). ACM, New York, NY, 217-226
10. Jones, S., Cunningham, S.J., McNab, R.J. and Boddie, S. 2000 A Transaction Log Analysis of a Digital Library. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3(2), 152-169.
11. Lange, P.G. 2007. Commenting on comments: Investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube. Presented at: Society for Applied Anthropology Conference, Tampa (FL, USA). URL: http://sfaapodcasts.files.wordpress.com/ 2007/04/update-apr-17-lange-sfaa-paper-2007.pdf
12. Lange, P.G. 2008. Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 361-380.
13. Lee, H., Smeaton, A.F., O'Connor, N., and Smyth, B. 2006. User evaluation of Fischlar-News: An automatic broadcast news delivery system. ACM TOIS, 24(2), 145-189.
14. McKay, D., Shukla, P., Hunt, R., and Cunningham, S.J. 2004. Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: three new approaches for browsing in Greenstone. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4/4, 283-297.
15. OECD Broadband Statistics to June 2006. URL: www.oecd.org/sti/ict/ broadband.
16. Ozmutlu, S., Spink, A., and Ozmutlu, H. 2004. A day in the life of Web searching: an exploratory study. Information Processing & Management, 40/2, 319-345.
17. Quinn, J.F., and Forsyth, C.J. 2005. Describing sexual behavior in the era of the internet: a typology for empirical research. Deviant Behavior, 26, 191-207.
18. Saarinen, J. 2006. Update: Business NZ's bogus broadband report. Computerworld NZ, 24 February 2006. URL: http://computerworld.co.nz/news. nsf/news/29BFF57CD51A236CCC25711E00732501.
19. Statistics New Zealand 2006. Household Use of Information and Communication Technology Survey: 2006. Published April 2006. URL: http://www.stats.govt.nz/NR/rdonlyres/4698FAB1-8395-4FE1-B844-75BAA95E0A4B/0/ householduseofict2006mr.pdf
20. Yang, M. & Marchionini, G. 2005. Deciphering visual gist and its implications for video retrieval and interface design. Proc. of CHI '05, 1877-1880.