Improving meeting capture by applying television production principles with audio and motion detection

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 227-236

  Ranjan, Abhishek ^a   Birnholtz, Jeremy ^a,b   Balakrishnan, Ravin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology

Author keywords

Automated camera control; Meeting capture; Video

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED CAMERA CONTROL; HUMAN RESOURCES; MEETING CAPTURE; MOTION CAPTURE SYSTEMS; MOTION DETECTIONS; PERFORMANCE APPROACHES; PROFESSIONAL CREWS; SMALL GROUPS; SYSTEM USE; VIDEO;

AUTOMATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; VIDEO RECORDING;

CAMERAS;

EID: 57649156196     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357095     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Abowd, G. Classroom 2000: an experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. IBM Systems Journal, 38, 4 (1999). 508-530.
2. Arijon, D. Grammar of the film language. Silman-James Press, 1991.
3. Bianchi, M.H., AutoAuditorium: a fully automatic, multi-camera system to televise auditorium presentations. In Joint DARPA/NIST Smart Spaces Technology Workshop (1998).
4. Birnholtz, J.P., Ranjan, A. and Balakrishnan, R. Using motion tracking data to augment video recordings in experimental social science research. In E-Social Science (2007) (in online proceedings).
5. Donald, R. and Spann, T. Fundamentals of TV production. Blackwell Publication, 2000.
6. Gaver, W., Sellen, A., Heath, C. and Luff, P. One is not enough: multiple views in a media space. In InterCHI Conference (1993), 335-341.
7. Gaver, W.W., The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. In ACM CSCW (1999), 17-24.
8. Human-Synergistics, The subarctic survival simulation (http://www.humansynergistics.com.au/content/products/simulations/survi val.asp).
9. Indico, http://indico.cern.ch.
10. Inoue, T., Okada, K. and Matsushita, Y. Evaluation of a videoconferencing system based on TV programs. In IEEE 19th International Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel (1996), 436-439.
11. Inoue, T., Okada, K. and Matsushita, Y. Learning from TV programs: application of TV presentation to a videoconferencing system. In ACM UIST (1995), 147-154.
12. Jaimes, A., Omura, K., Nagamine, T. and Hirata, K. Memory cues for meeting video retrieval. In ACM CARPE (2004), 74-85.
13. Kuney, J. Take one: television directors on directing. Praeger Publishers, 1990.
14. Liu, Q., Kimber, D., Foote, J., Wilcox, L. and Boreczky, J. FLYSPEC: a multi-user video camera system with hybrid human and automatic control. In ACM Multimedia (2002), 484-492.
15. Liu, Q., Rui, Y., Gupta, A. and Cadiz, J.J. Automating camera management for lecture room environments. In ACM CHI (2001), 442-449.
16. Lottridge, D. Hedonic affective response as a measure of human performance. http://www.imedia.mie.utoronto.ca/IML/model/technic alreports.php, University of Toronto, Interactive Media Lab, Toronto, 2007.
17. Meetings in america V: meeting of the minds, http://emeetings. verizonbusiness.com/meetingsinamerica/pdf/MIA5.pdf (2003).
18. Meetings in america: a study of trends, costs, and attitudes toward business travel and teleconferencing, and their impact on productivity, http://emeetings.verizonbusiness.com/meetingsinamerica/usw hitepaper.php (1999).
19. MeetingSense, www.meetingsense.com/.
20. Nickel, K. and Stiefelhagen, R. Pointing gesture recognition based on 3-D tracking of face, hands and head orientation. In ACM ICMI (2003), 140-146.
21. Ou, J., Oh, L.M., Fussell, S.R., Blum, T. and Yang, J. Analyzing and predicting focus of attention in remote collaborative tasks. In ACM ICMI (2005), 116-123.
22. Poltrock, S.E. and Engelbeck, G. Requirements for a virtual collocation environment. In ACM GROUP (1997), 61-70.
23. Polycom, http://www.polycom.com/.
24. Ranjan, A., Birnholtz, J.P. and Balakrishnan, R. An exploratory analysis of partner action and camera control in a video-mediated collaborative task. In ACM CSCW (2006), 403-412.
25. Rosenschein, S.J. Meeting capture: an essential part of the collaboration toolkit, http://www.cxoamerica.com /pastissue/article.asp?art=268314&issue= 202#top.
26. Rosenschein, S.J., Quindi meeting companion: a personal meeting-capture tool. In ACM CARPE (2004), 112-113.
27. Rubin, A.M. The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. Media Effects: Advances in theory- and persuasion (2002), 525-548.
28. Rui, Y., Gupta, A. and Cadiz, J.J. Viewing meeting captured by an omni-directional camera. In ACM CHI (2001), 450-457.
29. Rui, Y., Gupta, A. and Grudin, J. Videography for telepresentations. In ACM CHI (2003), 457-464.
30. Sellen, A.J. Speech patterns in video-mediated conversations. In ACM CHI (1992), 49-59.
31. Stiefelhagen, R., Yang, J. and Waibel, A. Modeling focus of attention for meeting indexing. In ACM Multimedia (Part 1) (1993), 3-10.
32. Takemae, Y., Otsuka, K. and Mukawa, N. Video cut editing rule based on participants' gaze in multiparty conversation. In ACM Multimedia (2003), 303-306.
33. Takemae, Y., Otsuka, K. and Yamato, J. Automatic video editing system using stereo-based head tracking for multiparty conversation. In ACM CHI extended abstracts (2005), 1817-1820.
34. Vertegaal, R. The GAZE groupware system: mediating joint attention in multiparty communication and collaboration. In ACM CHI (1999), 294-301.
35. Vertegaal, R., Weevers, I., Sohn, C. and Cheung, C. GAZE-2: conveying eye contact in group video conferencing using eye-controlled camera direction. In ACM CHI (2003), 521-528.
36. Vicon, http://www.vicon.com/.
37. WLAP, http://www.wlap.org/.
38. Zettl, H. Television production handbook. Thomson Wadsworth, 2005.