The need to assess the condition of aquatic resources in the US

Journal of the North American Benthological Society

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 808-811

  Shapiro, Michael H ^a   Holdsworth, Susan M ^a   Paulsen, Steven G ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; STREAM; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATER RESOURCE;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 57649136553     PISSN: 08873593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1899/08-116.1     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. CWA (CLEAN WATER ACT). 1972. Federal Water Pollution Control Act - Amendments of 1972. Public Law 92-500. 33.U.S.C.1251.
2. H. JOHN HEINZ CENTER FOR SCIENCE, ECONOMICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT. 2002. The state of the nation's ecosystems: measuring the lands, waters, and living resources of the United States. Cambridge University Press, New York.
3. NAPA (NATIONAL ACADEMY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION). 2002. Understanding what states need to protect water quality. Academy Project Number 2001-001. National Academy of Public Administration, Washington, DC. (Available from: http://www.napawash.org/ Water%20Quality.pdf)
4. NRC (NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL). 1977. Environmental monitoring. Volume IV. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
5. NRC (NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL). 1996. Linking science and technology to society's environmental goals. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
6. NRC (NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL). 2001. Assessing the TMDL approach to water quality management. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
7. USA TODAY. 2002. Environmental mysteries. Editorial. USA Today 26 September 2002.
8. st century. Final report. US Commission on Ocean Policy, Washington, DC. (Available from: http://www.oceancommission. gov/documents/full_color_rpt/000_ocean_full_report.pdf)
9. USDA (US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE). 2007. 2002 census Of agriculture: history. AC-02-S-5. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. (Available from: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2002/History/ History.pdf)
10. USEPA (US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY). 2003. Draft report on the environment 2003. EPA 260-R-02-006. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
11. USEPA (US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY). 2006. Wadeable streams assessment: a collaborative survey of the nation's streams. EPA 841/B-06/002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
12. USEPA (US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY) SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD. 1988. Appendix C: Strategies for ecological effects research. SAB-EC-88-040C. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
13. USGAO (US GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE). 1981. Better monitoring techniques are needed to assess the quality of rivers and streams. Volume 1. CED-81-30. US General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.
14. USGAO (US GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE). 1988. Protecting human health and the environment through improved management. GAO/RCED-88-101. US General Accounting Office, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
15. USGAO (US GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE). 2000. Water quality: key EPA and state decisions limited by inconsistent and incomplete data. GAO/RCED-00-54. US General Accounting Office, Gaithersburg, Maryland.