Does angiographic surveillance pose a risk in the management of coiled intracranial aneurysms? A multicenter study of 2243 patients

Neurosurgery

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 845-848

  Ringer, Andrew J ^a,i   Lanzino, Giuseppe ^b   Veznedaroglu, Erol ^c   Rodriguez, Rafael ^d   Mericle, Robert A ^e   Levy, Elad I ^f   Hanel, Ricardo A ^f   Lopes, Demetrius K ^g   Boulos, Alan S ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Puerto Rico)

^e VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^g RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aneurysm; Angiography; Coiling; Follow up; Morbidity

Indexed keywords

FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT;

APHASIA; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; CEREBELLUM INFARCTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISABILITY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY; HEMATOMA; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONAL CARE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANKIN SCALE; RETROPERITONEAL HEMATOMA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; SMALL GROIN HEMATOMA; STROKE; VERTIGO;

CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 57649128461     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000333261.63818.9C     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cottier JP, Bleuzen-Couthon A, Gallas S, Vinikoff-Sonier CB, Bertrand P, Domengie F, Barantin L, Herbreteau D: Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: Comparison of plain radiographs, 3D time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 45:818-824, 2003.
2. Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, Barnet HJ, Blom RJ: Clinical events following neuroangiography: A prospective study. Stroke 18:997-1004, 1987.
3. Earnest F 4th, Forbes G, Sandok BA, Piepgras DG, Faust RJ, Ilstrup DM, Arndt LJ: Complications of cerebral angiography: Prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 142:247-253, 1984.
4. Farb RI, Nag S, Scott JN, Willinsky RA, Marotta TR, Montanera WJ, Tomlinson G, Terbrugge KG: Surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: A comparison of MRA techniques. Neuroradiology 47:507-515, 2005.
5. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Caron S, Taschner CA, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP: Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. Imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Stroke 37:1033-1037, 2006.
6. Grzyska U, Freitag J, Zeumer H: Selective cerebral intraarterial DSA: Complication rate and control of risk factors. Neuroradiology 32:296-299, 1990.
7. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, Flom RA, Bird CR, Drayer BP, Fram EK: Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:1401-1411, 1994.
8. Horowitz MB, Dutton K, Purdy PD: Assessment of complication types and rates related to diagnostic angiography and interventional neuroradiologic procedures. A four year review (1993-1996). Intervent Neuroradiol 4:27-37, 1998.
9. Kähärä V: Postprocedural monitoring of cerebral aneurysms. Acta Radiol 47:320-327, 2006.
10. Majoie CB, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, Lavini C, Sluzewski M, van Rijn JC, den Heeten GJ: MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1349-1356, 2005.
11. Michardière R, Bensalem D, Martin D, Baudouin N, Binnert D: Comparison of MRA and angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with GDC. J Neuroradiol 28:75-83, 2001.
12. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group: International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomized trial. Lancet 360:12674274, 2002.
13. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Sandercock P; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group: International Subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomized comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809-817, 2005.
14. Moran CJ, Milburn JM, Cross D 3rd, Derdeyn CP, Dobbie TK, Littenberg B: Randomized controlled trials of sheaths in diagnostic neuroangiography. Radiology 218:183-187, 2001.
15. Pierot L, Delcourt C, Bouquigny F, Breidt D, Feuillet B, Lanoix O, Gallas S: Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:744-749, 2006.
16. Poncyljusz W, Czechowski J, Corr P, Falkowski A, Rac ME: MR-angiography as a method for evaluating endovascular coiled cerebral aneurysms. Med Sci Monit 13 [Suppl]1:59-64, 2007.
17. Pryor JC, Setton A, Nelson PK, Berenstein A: Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography and tips on avoidance. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 6:751-758, 1996.
18. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, Georganos SA, Juravsky L, Lambert A, Lamoureux J, Chagnon M, Roy D: Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 34:1398-1403, 2003.
19. Vitek JJ: Femoro-cerebral angiography: Analysis of 2000 consecutive examinations, special emphasis on carotid arteries catheterization in older patients. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 118:633-647, 1973.
20. Waugh JR, Sacharis N: Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 182:243-246, 1992.
21. Willinsky BA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W: Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: Prospective analysis of 2899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227:522-528, 2003.
22. Yamada N, Hayashi K, Murao K, Higashi M, Iihara K: Time-of-Flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1154-1157, 2004.