Reliance on schemas in source memory: Age differences and similarity of schemas

Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-21

  Besken, Miri ^a,b   Gülgöz, Sami ^a  

^a KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Age differences; Aging and memory; Knowledge and memory; Schema; Source memory; Source monitoring

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL TEST;

ADOLESCENT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 57649115454     PISSN: 13825585     EISSN: 17444128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13825580802175650     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bayen, U. J., & Murnane, K. (1996). Aging and the use of perceptual and temporal information in source memory tasks. Psychology & Aging, 11, 293-303.
2. Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 22, 197-215.
3. Bayen, U. J., Nakamura, G. V., Dupuis, S. E., & Yang, C.-L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28, 480-500.
4. Bravo, G., & Hébert, R. (1997). Age- and education-specific reference values for the mini-mental and modified mini-mental state examination derived from non-demented elderly population. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 1008-1018.
5. Chen, Y. (2004). Age differences in correction of context-induced biases: Source monitoring and timing of accountability. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 11, 58-67.
6. Chen, Y., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2000). Unwanted thought: Age differences in the correction of social judgments. Psychology and Aging, 15, 475-482.
7. Ferguson, S. A., Hashtroudi, S., & Johnson, M. K. (1992). Age differences in using sourcerelevant cues. Psychology & Aging, 7, 443-452.
8. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-197.
9. Hess, T. M., & Slaughter, S. V. (1991). Schematic knowledge influences on memory for scene information in young and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 26, 855-865.
10. Hess, T. M., & Tate, C. S. (1991). Adult age differences in explanations and memory for behavioral information. Psychology & Aging, 6, 86-92.
11. Hess, T. M., Donley, J., & Vandermaas, M. (1989). Aging-related changes in the processing and retention of script information. Experimental Aging Research, 15, 89-96.
12. Hicks, J. L., & Cockman, D. W. (2003). The effect of general knowledge on source memory and decision processes. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 489-501.
13. Holtgraves, T., Srull, T. K., & Socall, D. (1989). Conversation memory: The effects of speaker status on memory for the assertiveness of conversation remarks. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56, 149-160.
14. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
15. Johnson, M. K., De Leonardis, D. M., Hashtroudi, S., & Ferguson, S. A. (1995). Aging and single versus multiple cues in source monitoring. Psychology & Aging, 10, 507-517.
16. Lampinen, J. M., Copeland, S. M., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2001). Recollections of things schematic: Rooms schemas revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1211-1222.
17. Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neurological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 437-458.
18. Murnane, K., & Bayen, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 417-428.
19. Sherman, J. W., & Bessenoff, G. R. (1999). Stereotypes as source-monitoring cues: On the interaction between episodic and semantic memory. Psychological Science, 10, 106-110.
20. Stangor, C. (1988). Stereotype accessibility and information processing. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 694-708.
21. Tombaugh, T. N. (2005). Test-retest reliable coefficients and 5-year change scores for the MMSE and 3MS. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 485-503.