Does Use of a "Rim Cutter" Improve Quality of Cementation of the Acetabular Component of Cemented Exeter Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 71-76

  Conroy, Jonathan L ^a,b   Chawda, Mayur ^a,b   Kaushal, Rishi ^a,b   Whitehouse, Sarah L ^a,b   Crawford, Ross W ^a,b   English, Hugh ^a,c  

^a THE PRINCE CHARLES HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital Australia   (Australia)

Author keywords

acetabulum; cement mantle; cement penetration; rim cutter; total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; RIM CUTTER DEVICE; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 57649111536     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.130     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry. 2006 www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/publications.jsp.
2. Madey S.M., Callaghan J.J., Olejniczak J.P., et al. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 (1997) 53
3. Ballard W.T., Callaghan J.J., Sullivan P.M., et al. The results of improved cementing techniques for total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76 (1994) 959
4. Mulroy Jr. R.D., and Harris W.H. The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72 (1990) 757
5. Oishi C.S., Walker R.H., and Colwell C.W. The femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Six to eight-year follow up on one hundred consecutive patients after use of a third generation cementing technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76 (1994) 1130
6. Ranawat C.S., Rawlings B.A., and Harju V.T. Effect of modern cement technique on acetabular fixation total hip arthroplasty. A retrospective study in matched pairs. Orthop Clin North Am 19 (1988) 599
7. Ranawat C.S., Peters L.E., and Umlas M.E. Fixation of the acetabular component. The case for cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344 (1997) 207
8. Ranawat C.S., Deshmukh R.G., Peters L.E., et al. Prediction of long-term durability of all-polyethylene cemented sockets. Clin Orthop Relat Res 317 (1995) 89
9. Eftekhar N.S., and Nercessian O. Incidence and mechanism of failure of cemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 19 (1988) 557
10. Bourne R.B., Rorabeck C.H., Skutek M., et al. The Harris Design-2 total hip replacement fixed with so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A ten to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 (1998) 1775
11. Garcia-Cimbrelo E., Diez-Vasquez V., Madero R., et al. Progression of radiolucent lines adjacent to the acetabular component and factors influencing migration after Charnley low-friction total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 (1997) 1373
12. Ritter M.A., Zhou H., Keating C.M., et al. Radiological factors influencing femoral and acetabular failure in cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 (1999) 982
13. Rosenberg A.G. Fixation for the millennium: the hip. J Arthroplasty 17 suppl 1 (2002) 3
14. Flivik G., Wulff K., Sanfridsson J., et al. Improved acetabular pressurization gives better cement penetration: in vivo measurements during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 911
15. Machin D., Campbell M.J., Fayers P.M., et al. Sample size tables for clinical studies (1997), Blackwell Science, Oxford
16. Bombelli R. Osteoarthritis of the hip: classification and pathogenesis: the role of osteotomy as a consequent therapy. 2nd ed. (1983), Springer, New York
17. Hogan N., Azhar A., and Brady O. An improved acetabular cementing technique in total hip arthroplasty. Aspiration of the iliac wing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 1216
18. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice (1979), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
19. Crites B.M., Berend M.E., and Ritter M.A. Technical considerations of cemented acetabular components: a 30-year evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 381 (2000) 114
20. Oh I., Sander T.W., and Treharne R.W. Total hip acetabular cup flange design and its effect on cement fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 195 (1985) 304
21. Markolf K. In vitro and technical considerations in femoral component insertion. In the hip, proceedings of the ninth meeting of the hip society (1980), CV Mosby, St. Louis (Mo)
22. Krause W.R., Krug W., and Miller J. Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163 (1982) 290
23. Walker P.S., Soudry M., Ewald F.C., et al. Control of cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 185 (1984) 155
24. Juliusson R., Flivik G., Nilsson J., et al. Circulating blood diminishes cement penetration into cancellous bone. In vivo study of 21 arthrotic femoral heads. Acta Orthop Scand 66 (1995) 234
25. McCaskie A.W., Barnes M.R., Lin E., et al. Cement pressurisation during hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 (1997) 379
26. Shelley P., and Wroblewski B.M. Socket design and cement pressurisation in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70 (1988) 358
27. Hodgkinson J.P., Maskell A.P., Paul A., et al. Flanged acetabular components in cemented Charnley hip arthroplasty. Ten-year follow-up of 350 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 (1993) 464
28. Parsch D., Diehm C., Schnieder S., et al. Acetabular cementing technique in THA-flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments. Acta Orthop Scand 75 (2004) 269
29. Oh I., Merckx D.B., and Harris W.H. Acetabular cement compactor. An experimental study of pressurization of cement in the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 177 (1983) 289
30. Joshi R.P., Eftekhar N.S., McMahon D.J., et al. Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty. A comparison of two matched paired groups. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 (1998) 585
31. Oh I., Sander T.W., and Treharne R.W. Aetabular cement strains for different cement thickness and shapes of cement mantle: in vitro strain gage study. Trans 29th Ann O.R.S. 8 (1983) 65
32. Oh I., Sanders T.W., and Treharne R.W. Acetabular cup groove and pod design and its effect on cement fixation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 189 (1984) 308
33. Sandhu H.S., Martin W.N., Bishay M., et al. Acetabular cement mantles and component positioning. Are we achieving "ideal" results?. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 841
34. Wroblewski B.M., Lynch M Aitkinson J.R., Dowson D., et al. External wear of the polyethylene socket in cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69 (1987) 61