The recent decline in mammography rates is limited to low- to average-risk women

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 196, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 821-826

  Slomiany, Beatrix A ^a   McMasters, Kelly M ^a   Chagpar, Anees B ^a  

^a University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Mammography; Risk factors; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SURVEY; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 57649105259     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.029     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Society AC. Cancer Facts and Figures, 2007 (2007), American Cancer Society, Atlanta
2. Society AC. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2005-2006 (2006), American Cancer Society, Atlanta
3. Barth Jr. R.J., Gibson G.R., Carney P.A., et al. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 324-329
4. Chagpar A.B., and McMasters K.M. Trends in mammography and clinical breast examination: a population-based study. J Surg Res 140 (2007) 214-219
5. Claus E.B., Risch N., and Thompson W.D. Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction. Cancer 73 (1994) 643-651
6. Fisher B., Anderson S., Bryant J., et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 1233-1241
7. Statistics NCfH. Data File Documentation. National Health Interview Survey; 2000 ed (2002), National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD
8. Statistics NCfH. Data File Documentation. National Health Interview Survey 2005 (2006), National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD
9. Shapiro S. Periodic screening for breast cancer: The HIP randomized controlled trial. Health insurance plan. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22 (1997) 27-30
10. Alexander F.E., Anderson T.J., Brown H.K., et al. 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening. Lancet 353 (1999) 1903-1908
11. Andersson I., and Janzon L. Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmo Mammographic Screening Program. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22 (1997) 63-67
12. Bjurstam N., Bjorneld L., Warwick J., et al. The Gothemberg breast screening trial. Cancer 97 (2003) 2387-2396
13. Frisell J., Lidbrink E., Hellstrom L., et al. Follow up after 11 years-update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 45 (1997) 263-270
14. Miller A.B., To T., Baines C.J., and Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 92 (2000) 1490-1499
15. Miller A.B., To T., Baines C.J., and Wall C. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11-16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40-49 years. Ann Intern Med 137 (2002) 305-312
16. Nystrom L., Andersson I., Bjurstam N., et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: Updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 359 (2002) 909-919 (erratum in Lancet 2002;360:724)
17. Tabar L., Yen M.-F., Vitak B., et al. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361 (2003) 1405-1410
18. Feldstein A.C., Vogt T.M., Aickin M., et al. Mammography screening rates decline: a person-time approach to evaluation. Prev Med 43 (2006) 178-182
19. Breen N., et al. Reported drop in mammography: is this cause for concern?. Cronin A, K. Cancer 109 (2007) 2405-2409
20. Susan G Breast K Cancer Foundation I, and Susan G. Komen for the Cure and Affilitates. Consolidated Financial Reports (2007)
21. Susan G Breast K Cancer Foundation I. Consolidated Financial Statements (2004) March 31
22. Honda K., and Neugut A.I. Associations between perceived cancer risk and established risk factors in a national community sample. Cancer Detect Prev 28 (2004) 1-7
23. Byers T., Barrera E., Fontham E.T.H., et al. A midpoint assessment of the American Cancer Society challenge goal to halve the U.S. cancer mortality rates between the years 1990 and 2015. Cancer 107 (2006) 396-405
24. Makuc D.M., Breen N., Meissner H.I., et al. Financial barriers to mammography: who pays out-of-pocket?. J Womens Health 16 (2007) 349-360
25. Wu H., Zhu K., Jatoi I., et al. Factors associated with the incompliance with mammogram screening among individuals with a family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101 (2007) 317-324
26. Saslow D., Boetes C., Burke W., et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57 (2007) 75-89 (erratum in CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:185)