Dynamic range independent image quality assessment

SIGGRAPH'08: International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 Papers 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Aydm, Tunç Ozan ^a   Mantiuk, Rafal ^a   Myszkowski, Karol ^a   Seidel, Hans Peter ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

High dynamic range images; Image quality metrics; Tone reproduction; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

CURRENT QUALITIES; DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES; DYNAMIC RANGES; HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE IMAGERIES; HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE IMAGES; HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEMS; IMAGE APPEARANCES; IMAGE FIDELITIES; IMAGE PAIRS; IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENTS; IMAGE QUALITY METRIC; IMAGE QUALITY METRICS; IMAGE STRUCTURES; PIXEL INTENSITIES; REFERENCE IMAGES; TEST IMAGES; TONE MAPPING OPERATORS; TONE REPRODUCTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

COLOR IMAGE PROCESSING; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VISION;

IMAGE QUALITY;

EID: 57649096581     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. AKYÜZ, A. O., REINHARD, E., FLEMING, R., RIECKE, B. E., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2007. Do HDR displays support LDR content? a psychophysical evaluation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 26, 3. Article 38.
2. CRAMÉR, H. 1999. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press.
3. D'AGOSTINO, R. 1972. Relation between the chi-squared and ANOVA test for testing equality of k independent dichotomous populations. The American Statistician 26, 30-32.
4. DALY, S. 1993. The Visible Differences Predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In Digital Images and Human Vision, MIT Press, A. B. Watson, Ed., 179-206.
5. DRAGO, F., MYSZKOWSKI, K., ANNEN, T., AND CHIBA, N. 2003. Adaptive logarithmic mapping for displaying high contrast scenes. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. of EUROGRAPHICS) 24, 3,419-426.
6. DURAND, F., AND DORSEY, J. 2002. Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 21,3, 257-266.
7. FATTAL, R., LTSCHINSKI, D., AND WERMAN, M. 2002. Gradient domain high dynamic range compression. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 21, 3, 249-256.
8. JANSSEN, R. 2001. Computational Image Quality. SPIE Press.
9. KUANG, J., JOHNSON, G. M., AND FAIRCHILD, M. D. 2007. iCAM06: A refined image appearance model for hdr image rendering. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 18, 5, 406-414.
10. LUBIN, J. 1995. Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition. World Scientific, ch. A Visual Discrimination Model for Imaging System Design and Evaluation, 245-283.
11. MANTIUK, R., DALY, S., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2005. Predicting visible differences in high dynamic range images - model and its calibration. In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging X, vol. 5666 of SPIE Proceedings Series, 204-214.
12. MEYLAN, L., DALY, S., AND SUSSTRUNK, S. 2007. Tone mapping for high dynamic range displays. In HUMAN VISION AND ELECTRONIC IMAGING XII, SPIE, volume 6492.
13. MOON, P., AND SPENCER, D. 1944. On the stiles-crawford effect. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 34, 319-329.
14. PATTANAIK, S. N., TUMBLIN, J. E., YEE, H., AND GREENBERG, D. P. 2000. Time-dependent visual adaptation for fast realistic image display. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, 47-54.
15. RAMANARAYANAN, G., FERWERDA, J., WALTER, B., AND BALA, K. 2007. Visual Equivalence: Towards a new standard for Image Fidelity. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 26, 3. Article 76.
16. REINHARD, E., STARK, M., SHIRLEY, P., AND FERWERDA, J. 2002. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 21, 3, 267-276.
17. REINHARD, E., WARD, G., PATTANAIK, S., AND DEBEVEC, P. 2005. High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting. Morgan Kauffman.
18. REMPEL, A. G., TRENTACOSTE, M., SEETZEN, H., YOUNG, H. D., HEIDRICH, W., WHITEHEAD, L., AND WARD, G. 2007. Ldr2Hdr: On-the-fly reverse tone mapping oflegacy video and photographs. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 26, 3. Article 39.
19. SEETZEN, H., HEIDRICH, W., STUERZLINGER, W., WARD, G., WHITEHEAD, L., TRENTACOSTE, M., GHOSH, A., AND VOROZCOVS, A. 2004. High dynamic range display systems. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004.
20. SMITH, K., KRAWCZYK, G., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2006. Beyond tone mapping: Enhanced depiction of tone mapped HDR images. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. of EUROGRAPHICS) 25, 3, 427-438.
21. WANG, Z., AND BOVIK, A. C. 2002. A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 9, 3 (March), 81-84.
22. WANG, Z., AND BOVIK, A. C. 2006. Modern Image Quality Assessment. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
23. WANG, Z., AND SIMONCELLI, E. P. 2005. Translation insensitive image similarity in complex wavelet domain. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, & Signal Processing, vol. II, 573-576.
24. WANG, Z., SIMONCELLI, E., AND BOVIK, A., 2003. Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment.
25. WATSON, A. 1987. The Cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images. Comp. Vision Graphics and Image Processing 39, 311-327.
26. WATSON, A. 2000. Visual detection of spatial contrast patterns: Evaluation of five simple models. Optics Express 6, 1, 12-33.
27. WINKLER, S. 2005. Digital Video Quality: Vision Models and Metrics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
28. WU, H., AND RAO, K. 2005. Digital Video Image Quality and Perceptual Coding. CRC Press.