Antenatal care service availability and utilization in rural Viet Nam

Asia-Pacific Population Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Do, Mai ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING WORLD; EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTH STATUS; MATERNAL HEALTH; PREGNANCY; PRIVATE SECTOR; PUBLIC SECTOR; RURAL AREA;

ASIA; EURASIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA; VIET NAM;

EID: 57549115567     PISSN: 0259238X     EISSN: 15644278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bertrand, J.T. and others (1995). "Access, quality of care and medical barriers in family planning program", International Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 64-69 and 74.
2. Bollen, K.A., J. Glanville and G. Stecklov (2001). "Socioeconomic status and class in studies of fertility and health in developing countries", Annual Review of Sociology, vol.. 27, pp.153-185.
3. Bruce, J. (1990). "Fundamental elements of quality of care: a simple framework", Studies in Family Planning, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 61-91.
4. Celik, Y. and D.R. Hotchkiss (2000) "The socio-economic determinants of maternal health care utilization in Turkey", Social Science and Medicine, vol. 50, No. 12, pp. 1797-1806.
5. Filmer, D. and L. Pritchett (2001). "Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data - or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India", Demography, vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 115-132.
6. Glei, D., N. Goldman and G. Rodriguez (2003). "Utilization of care during pregnancy in rural Guatemala: does obstetrical need matter?", Social Science and Medicine, vol. 57, No. 12, pp. 2447-2463.
7. Goldstein, Harvey (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models (London: Edward Arnold).
8. Greenland, S. (1992). "Divergent biases in ecologic and individual-level studies", Statistics in Medicine, vol. 11, No. 9, pp. 1209-1223.
9. - (2001). "Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects", International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 1343-1350.
10. Griffiths, P. and R. Stephenson (2001). "Understanding users' perspectives of barriers to maternal health-care use in Maharashtra, India", Journal of Biosocial Sciences, vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 339-359.
11. Magadi, M.A., N.J. Madise and R.N. Rodrigues (2000). "Frequency and timing of antenatal care in Kenya: explaining the variations between women of different communities", Social Science and Medicine, vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 551-561.
12. Pebley, A.R., N. Goldman and G. Rodriguez (1996). "Prenatal and delivery care and childhood immunization in Guatemala: do family and community matter?", Demography, vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 231-247.
13. Rutstein, S.O. and K. Johnson (2004). "The DHS Wealth Index", DHS Comparative Reports. No. 6 (Calverton, Maryland, United States of America, ORC Macro).
14. Shieh, Y. Y. and R.T. Fouladi (2003). "The effect of multicollinearity on multilevel modeling parameter estimates and standard errors", Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 951-985.
15. StataCorp (2005). Stata Statistical Software: Release 9 (College Station, Texas, United States of America, StataCorp).
16. Stephenson, Rob and Amy O. Tsui (2002). "Contextual influences on reproductive health service use in Uttar Pradesh, India", Studies in Family Planning, vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 309-320.
17. Swenson, I.E. and others (1993). "Factors related to the utilization of prenatal care in Vietnam", Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 76-85.
18. Tran, T. and others (2005). "Comparative quality of private and public health services in rural Vietnam", Health Policy and Planning, vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 319-327.
19. Valdivia, Martin (2002). "Public health infrastructure and equity in the utilization of outpatient health care services in Peru", Health Policy and Planning, vol. 17, Suppl. No. 1, pp. 12-19.
20. Viet Nam (1995). Vietnam Intercensal Demographic Survey 1994: Major Findings, General Statistical Office (GSO) (Hanoi, Statistical Publishing House).
21. - (1999). Vietnam Demographic and Health Survey 1997 (Hanoi, National Committee for Population and Family Planning).
22. - (2001). National Strategy on Reproductive Health Care for the 2001-2010 Period (Hanoi, Ministry of Health.
23. - and ORC Macro (2003). Vietnam Demographic and Health Survey 2002. (Calverton, Maryland, United States of America Committee for Population, Family and Children (CPFC)[Viet Nam]).
24. Wakefield, J. and R. Salway (2001). "A statistical framework for ecological and aggregate studies", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 164, No.1, pp. 119-137.
25. Wagstaff, A. and N. Watanabe (2003). "What difference does the choice of SES make in health inequality measurement?", Health Economics, vol. 12, No. 10, pp. 885-890.