The rise of a 'social development' agenda in New Zealand

International Journal of Social Welfare

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-12

  Lunt, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

New Zealand; Social development; Social investment; Welfare reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 57549114242     PISSN: 13696866     EISSN: 14682397     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00557.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Benson-Pope D (2004). Address to NZ Labour Party Regional Conference, Invercargill, 27 March.
2. Bourdieu P (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Polity Press.
3. Bromwell D, Hyland M (2007). Social Inclusion and Participation: A Guide for Policy and Planning. Wellington, Social Inclusion and Participation Group, Ministry of Social Development.
4. Castles FG, Shirley I (1996). Labour and social policy, gravediggers or refurbishers of the welfare state. In: Castles FG, Gerritsen R, Vowles J, eds. The Great Experiment: Labour Parties and Public Transformation. Auckland, AUP.
5. Clark H, Maharey S (2001). Pathways to Opportunity: From Social Welfare to Social Development. Wellington, New Zealand Government.
6. Clark H (2002). Growing an Innovative New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand Government.
7. Davey J (2000). Another New Zealand Experiment: A Code of Social and Family Responsibility. Wellington, Institute of Policy Studies.
8. Dean H, Bonvin J-M, Vielle P, Farvaque N (2005). Developing capabilities and rights in welfare-to-work policies. European Societies 7: 3-26.
9. Department of Social Welfare (1991). Towards Welfare that Works. Wellington, DSW.
10. Dobrowolsky A, Jenson J (2005). Social investment perspectives and practices: A decade of British politics. In: Powell M, Bauld L, Clarke K, eds. Social Policy Review 17: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy. Bristol, Policy Press.
11. Edelman M (1964). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Chicago, University of Illinois Press.
12. Edelman M (1971). Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. Institute for Research on Poverty, Monograph Series. Chicago, Markham Publishing Company.
13. Edelman M (1977). Political Language: Words that Succeed and Politics that Fail. Institute for Research on Poverty, Monograph Series. New York, Academic Press.
14. Edelman M (1988). Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
15. Esping-Andersen G (2002). Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
16. Fairclough N (2000). New Labour, New Language. London, Routledge.
17. Fraser L, Gordon N (1994). A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs 19: 309-336.
18. Gellner E (1964). Thought and Change. London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
19. Hall S, Jacques M (1983). Introduction. In: Hall S, Jacques M, eds. The Politics of Thatcherism. London, Lawrence and Wishart.
20. Jenson J, Saint-Martin D (2003). New routes to social cohesion? Citizenship and the social investment state. Canadian Journal of Sociology 28: 77-99.
21. Kelsey J (1997). The New Zealand Experiment: A World Model for Structural Adjustment. Auckland, Auckland University Press/Bridget Williams Books.
22. Kelsey J, OBrien M (1995). Setting the Record Straight: Social Development in Aotearoa New Zealand. Wellington, ANGOA.
23. Larner W (2000). Post-welfare state governance: Towards a code of social and family responsibility. Social Politics 7: 244-265.
24. Lister R (2003). Investing in the citizen-workers of the future: transformations in citizenship and the state under New Labour. Social Policy & Administration 37: 427-443.
25. Lunt N (2006). Employability and New Zealand welfare restructuring. Policy & Politics 34: 473-494.
26. Maharey S (2005). Social Development in Action. Victoria University of Wellington School of Government panel discussion on social welfare, Wellington 19 July 2005.
27. Ministry for Social Development (2004). Opportunity for all New Zealanders. Wellington, MSD.
28. Ministry of Social Policy (2001). The Social Development Approach. Wellington, Ministry of Social Policy.
29. National Party (1987). Manifesto. Wellington, National Party.
30. New Zealand Government (2000). Opportunity, Capacity, Participation: Government Employment Strategy. Wellington, NZG.
31. New Zealand Immigration Service (2007). New Zealand Immigration Service Operational Manual. Wellington, NZIS.
32. New Zealand Treasury (1987). Treasury Briefing Paper. Wellington, NZ Treasury.
33. O'Brien M, Wilkes C (1993). The Tragedy of the Market. Palmerston North, Dunmore Press.
34. Ortony A, ed. (1984). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, CUP.
35. Phillips L (1998). Hegemony and political discourse: The lasting impact of Thatcherism. Sociology 32: 847-867.
36. Player M (1994). Welfare to well-being. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 3: 77-81.
37. Powell M (2000). New Labour and the third way in the British welfare state: A new and distinctive approach? Critical Social Policy 20: 39-60.
38. Rochefort DA, Cobb RW (1994). The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Kansas, University of Kansas Press.
39. Roper B (2005). Prosperity for all? Economic, Social and Political Change in New Zealand since 1935. Southbank, Thomson/Dunmore Press.
40. Schram SF (1995). World of Welfare: The Poverty of Social Science and the Social Science of Poverty. Minneapolis/London, University of Minnesota Press.
41. Schram SF (2000). After Welfare: The Culture of Postindustrial Social Policy. New York, New York University Press.
42. Schram SF, Soss J (2001). Success stories: Welfare reform, policy discourse, and the politics of research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 577: 49-65.
43. Schmidt VA (2001a). Values and discourse in the politics of adjustment. In: Scharfe F, Schmidt VA, eds. Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, Vol. I. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
44. Schmidt V (2001b). The politics of economic adjustment in France and Britain: When does discourse matter? Journal of European Public Policy 8: 247-264.
45. Schneider A, Ingram H (1993). Social constructionism of target populations. American Political Science Review 87: 334-347.
46. Schön DA, Rein M (1994). Frame reflection: Towards the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, Basic Books.
47. Shapiro MJ (1981). Language and Political Understanding: The Politics of Discursive Practices. New Haven, Yale University Press.
48. Stephens R, Callister P (2007). Work-life balance. In: Lunt N, OBrien M, Stephens R, eds. New Welfare, New Zealand. Melbourne, Thomson Press.
49. Stone D (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly 104: 281-300.
50. Weiss JA (1989). The powers of problem definition: The case of government paperwork, Policy Sciences 22: 97-121.