Manipulating replication processes within a dynamic covalent framework

Organic Letters

Volumn 10, Issue 20, 2008, Pages 4589-4592

  Del Amo, Vicente ^a   Slawin, Alexandra M Z ^a   Philp, Douglas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 57549096380     PISSN: 15237060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ol8018665     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. For general reviews on replication, see: (a) Patzke, V.; von Kiedrowski, G. Arkivoc 2007, 293.
2. (b) Paul, N.; Joyce, G. F. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 634.
3. (c) Li, X.; Chmielewski, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 901.
4. (d) Robertson, A.; Sinclair, A. J.; Philp, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2000, 29, 141.
5. (e) Lee, D. H.; Severin, K.; Ghadiri, M. R. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 491.
6. (a) Kindermann, M.; Stahl, I.; Reimold, M.; Pankau, W. M.; von Kiedrowski, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6750.
7. (b) Stankiewicz, J.; Eckardt, L. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 342.
8. (c) Corbett, P. T.; Sanders, J. K. M.; Otto, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8858.
9. (d) Sarma, R. J.; Nitschke, J. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 377.
10. (e) Ludlow, R. F.; Otto, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 101.
11. (f) Dadon, Z.; Wagner, N.; Ashkenasy, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6128.
12. (a) Allen, V. C.; Philp, D.; Spencer, N. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 777.
13. (b) Quayle, J. M.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Philp, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7229.
14. (c) Pearson, R. J.; Kassianidis, E.; Philp, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 4777.
15. (d) Kassianidis, E.; Pearson, R. J.; Philp, D. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3833.
16. (e) Pearson, R. J.; Kassianidis, E.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Philp, D. Chem.-Eur. J. 2006, 12, 6829.
17. (f) Kassianidis, E.; Philp, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6334.
18. For general reviews, see: (a) Lehn, J.-M. Chem.-Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2455.
19. (b) Rowan, S. J.: Cantrill, S. J.; Cousins, G. R. L.; Sanders, J. K. M.; Stoddart, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 898.
20. (c) Corbett, P. T.; Leclaire, J.; Vial, L; West, K. R.; Wietor, J.-L.; Sanders, J. K. M.; Otto, S. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3652.
21. (d) Otto, S.; Severin, K. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 277, 267.
22. For a set of imine-hased replicating systems which operate in polar aprotic solvents, see: Terfort, A.; von Kiedrowski, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 654.
23. For an imine-based self-duplicator, see: Xu, S.; Giuseppone, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1826.
24. For some recent examples, see: (a) Rowan, S. J.; Stoddart, J. F. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1913.
25. (b) Nitschke, J. R.; Lehn, J.-M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 11970.
26. (c) Godoy-Alcantar, C.; Yatsimirsky, A. K.; Lehn, J.-M. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005, 18, 979.
27. (d) Nitschke, J. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3073.
28. (e) Giuseppone, N.; Schmitt, J. L.; Schwartz, E.; Lehn, J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5528.
29. (f) Oh, K.; Jeong, K. S.; Moore, J. S. Nature 2001, 414, 889.
30. (g) Zhao, D. H.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9996.
31. (h) Hochgurtel, M.; Kroth, H.; Piecha, D.; Hofmann, M. W.; Nicolau, C.; Krause, S.; Schaaf, O.; Sonnenmoser, G.; Eliseev, A. V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 3382.
32. (i) Storm, O.; Lüning, U. Chem.-Eur. J. 2002, 8, 793.
33. (J) Bugaut, A.: Toulme, J. J.; Rayner, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3144.
34. (k) Schultz, D.; Nitschke, J. R. Chem.-Eur. J. 2007, 13, 3660.
35. (l) Sarma, R. J.; Otto, S.; Nitschke, J. R. Chem.-Eur. J. 2007, 13, 9542.
36. (m) Nitschke, J. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 103.
37. reverse for this transformation. The intramolecular nature of [1·2·3] → [3·3] will result in this process being accelerated with respect to the bimolecular pathway 1 + 2 → 3. The reverse process [3·3] → [1·2·3] is still bimolecular, and thus, one would envisage that this rate is close to that for 3 → 1 + 2. The net effect is therefore to increase K for the recognition-mediated process making the formation of 3 from [1·2·3] more favorable.
38. 1H NMR spectroscopy. The disappearance of the resonances arising from the aldehyde protons in 2 and 5 (δ = 9.95-10.05) and the simultaneous appearance of resonances arising from the imine protons in 3 and 6 (δ = 8.42-8.47) were monitored. Concentration vs time profiles were constructed by deconvolution of these resonances.
39. 4-Bromophenylacetic acid (1 equiv) was added to the control reaction between 1 and 5 to ensure that the acid concentration was the same as in reactions involving aldehyde 2.
40. See the Supporting Information for the concentration vs time profile for this experiment.
41. (a) Kirby, A. J. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1980,17, 183.
42. (b) Mandolini, L. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1986, 22, 1.
43. (c) Cacciapaglia, R.; Di Stefano, S.; Mandolini, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 113.
44. Bennes, R. M.; Philp, D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3651.
45. (a) Glink, P. T.; Oliva, A. I.; Stoddart, J. F.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 40, 1870.
46. (b) Aricó; Chang, T.; Cantrill, S. J.; Khan, S. I.; Stoddart, J. F. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 4055.
47. (c) Cantrill, S. J.; Rowan, S. J.; Stoddart, J. F. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1363.
48. (J) Hartley. C. S.; Elliot, E. L.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4512.
49. (e) Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, G.; Wanmith, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 43, 901.
50. (f) Liu, X.; Warmuth, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 43, 14120.
51. (g) Chichak, K. S.; Cantrill, S. J.; Pease, A. R.; Chiu, S.-H.; Cave, G. W. V.; Atwood, J. L.; Stoddart, J. F. Science 2004, 304, 1308.
52. (h) Peters A. J.; Chichak, K. S.; Cantrill, S. J.; Stoddart, J. F. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3394.
53. (i) Huc, I.; Lehn, J.-M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 2106.
54. 3 prevented the study of the system in the presence of higher loadings of 4.