Comparison of surface seismic sources at the CO2 SINK site, Ketzin, Germany

Geophysical Prospecting

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 125-139

  Yordkayhun, Sawasdee ^a   Ivanova, Alexandra ^b   Giese, Rüdiger ^b   Juhlin, Christopher ^a   Cosma, Calin ^c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^c Vibrometric Oy   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC INTENSITY; CARBON DIOXIDE; DROPS; PROFILOMETRY; REFLECTION; SEISMOLOGY; SURVEYS;

3D SURVEYS; ACQUISITION PARAMETERS; DATA QUALITIES; FREQUENCY CONTENTS; FREQUENCY SIGNALS; GEOLOGICAL STORAGES; GERMANY; PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS; PILOT STUDIES; PRODUCTION TIMES; REFLECTION SEISMIC; SEISMIC SOURCES; SIGNAL CHARACTERISTICS; SIGNAL PENETRATIONS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIOS; STUDY SITES; SURFACE CONDITIONS; SURFACE SOURCES; TEST SITES; TRAVEL TIMES; TWO SOURCES;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; SEISMIC REFLECTION; SEISMIC SOURCE; SEISMIC SURVEY;

BRANDENBURG; CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; KETZIN;

EID: 57549093971     PISSN: 00168025     EISSN: 13652478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00737.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 2 injected at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data. Energy 29, 1383-1392.
2. Barbier M.G., Bondon P., Mellinger R. and Viallix J.R. 1976. MiniSOSIE for shallow land seismology. Geophysical Prospecting 24, 518-527.
3. Barnes A.E. 1994. Moho reflectivity and seismic signal penetration. Tectonophysics 232, 299-307.
4. Benjumea B. and Teixido T. 2001. Seismic reflection constraints on the glacial dynamics of Johnsons Glacier, Antarctica. Journal of Applied Geophysics 46, 31-44.
5. Buhnemann J. and Holliger K. 1998. Comparison of high-frequency seismic sources at the Grimsel test site, central Alps, Switzerland. Geophysics 63, 1363-1370.
6. Cosma C. and Enescu N. 2001. Characterization of fractured rock in the vicinity of tunnels by the swept impact seismic technique. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 38, 815-821.
7. 2 Flood at Weyburn Field, Saskatchewan, Canada. 64th EAGE meeting, Florence, Italy, Expanded Abstracts.
8. Feroci M., Orlando L., Balia R., Bosman C., Cardarelli E. and Deidda G. 2000. Some considerations on shallow seismic reflection surveys. Journal of Applied Geophysics 45, 127-139.
9. 2 SINK geological storage site at Ketzin, Germany. Environmental Geosciences 13, 145-161.
10. Herbst R., Kapp I., Krummel H. and Luck E. 1998. Seismic sources for shallow investigations: A field comparison from Northern Germany. Journal of Applied Geophysics 38, 301-317.
11. Hunter J.A., Pullan S.E., Burns R.A., Gagne R.M. and Good R.L. 1984. Shallow seismic reflection mapping of the overburden-bedrock interface with the engineering seismograph - some simple techniques. Geophysics 49, 1381-1385.
12. Juhlin C., Giese R., Zinck-Jrgensen K., Cosma C., Kazemeini H., Juhojuntti N. et al. 2007. 3D baseline seismics at Ketzin, Germany: The CO2SINK project. Geophysics 72, B121-B132.
13. Juhojuntti N. and Juhlin C. 1998. Seismic lower crustal reflectivity and signal penetration in the Siljan Ring area, Central Sweden. Tectonophysics 288, 17-30.
14. Jongerius P. and Helbig K. 1988. On-shore high-resolution seismic profiling applied to sedimentology. Geophysics 53, 1276-1283.
15. Knapp R.W. and Steeples D.W. 1986. High-resolution common depth-point reflection profiling: Field acquisition parameter design. Geophysics 51, 283-294.
16. Knopoff L. 1964. Q. Reviews of Geophysics 2, 625-660.
17. Mayer J.R. and Brown L.D. 1986. Signal penetration in the COCORP Basin and Range-Colorado plateau survey. Geophysics 51, 1050-1055.
18. Metz B., Davidson O., de Coninck H., Loos M. and Meyer L. 2005. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: IPCC Special Report. Cambridge University Press.
19. Park C.B., Miller R.D., Steeples D.W. and Black R.A. 1996. Swept impact seismic technique (SIST). Geophysics 61, 1789-1803.
20. Praeg D. 2003. Seismic imaging of mid-Pleistocene tunnel-valleys in the North Sea Basin -high resolution from low frequencies. Journal of Applied Geophysics 53, 273-298.
21. Pullan S.E. and MacAulay H.A. 1987. An in-hole shotgun source for engineering seismic surveys. Geophysics 52, 985-996.
22. Reinhardt H.G. 1993. Regionales Kartenwerk der Reflexionsseismik. VEB Geophysik Leipzig.
23. Sheriff R.E. 1975. Factors affecting seismic amplitudes. Geophysical Prospecting 23, 125-138.
24. Staples R.K., Hobbs R.W. and White R.S. 1999. A comparison between airguns and explosives as wide-angle seismic sources. Geophysical Prospecting 47, 313-339.
25. Steeples D.W. and Miller R.D. 1990. Seismic reflection methods applied to engineering, environmental, and groundwater problems. In: Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics I: Review and Tutorial, Vol. 1 (ed. S.H. Ward), pp. 1-30. SEG.
26. Steer D.N., Brown L.D., Knapp J.H. and Baird D.J. 1996. Comparison of explosive and vibroseis source energy penetration during COCORP deep seismic reflection profiling in the Williston Basin. Geophysics 61, 211-221.
27. Telford W.M., Geldart L.P. and Sheriff R.E. 1990. Applied Geophysics. Cambridge University Press.
28. Woodward D. 1994. Contributions to a shallow aquifer study by reprocessed seismic sections from petroleum exploration surveys, eastern Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Journal of Applied Geophysics 31, 271-289.
29. Wright C., Wright J.A. and Hall J. 1994. Seismic reflection techniques for base metal exploration in eastern Canada: Examples from Buchans, Newfoundland. Journal of Applied Geophysics 32, 105-116.
30. 2 in an onshore aquifer, Nagaoka, Japan. IEA Monitoring and Verification Workshop, Santa Cruz.