Application of stochastic response surface method in the structural stochastic response

Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2021-2025

  Guo, Zhi Wei ^a   Bai, Guang Chen ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Aerospace structure; Polynomial chaos; Stochastic response surface; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; MONTE CARLO METHODS; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; POLYNOMIALS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

AERO- ENGINES; AEROSPACE STRUCTURE; MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS; NUMERICAL EXAMPLES; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; PROBABILITY DENSITY CURVES; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODS; RESPONSE SURFACES; STOCHASTIC RESPONSE SURFACE; STOCHASTIC RESPONSE SURFACE METHODS; STOCHASTIC RESPONSES; UNCERTAINTY;

CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 57449115121     PISSN: 10008055     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ghanem R, Spanos P D. Polynomial chaos in stochastic finite elements[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1990, 57(1): 197-202.
2. Schuëller G I. A state of the art report on computational stochastic mechanics[J]. Journal of Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1997, 12(4): 197-313.
3. Shinozuka M, Deodatis G. Response variability of stochastic finite element systems[J]. Stochastic Mechanics, 1986, (1): 215-222.
4. Matthies H G, Brenner C E, Bucher C G, et al. Uncertainties in probabilistic numerical analysis of structures and solids-stochastic finite elements[J]. Structural Safety, 1997, 19(3): 283-336.
5. Ghanem R, Spanos P D. Stochastic finite element: a spectral approach[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
6. Hurdo J E, Alvarez D A. Neural network-based reliability analysis: A comparative study[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 191: 113-132.
7. JIN Long, KUANG Xueyuan, HUANG Haihong, et al. Study on the overfitting of the artificial neural network forecasting model[J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2005, 19(2): 216-225.
8. Myers R H, Montgomery D C. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments[M]. Wiley, 2002.
9. Isulapalli S S, Roy A, Georgopoulos P G. Stochastic response surface methods for uncertainty propagation: application to environmental and biological systems[J]. Risk Analysis, 1998, 18(3): 351-363.
10. Isukapalli S S, Balakrishnan S. Computationally efficient uncertainty propagation and reduction using the stochastic response surface method[C]//IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. 2004: 2237-2243.
11. Wiener N. The homogeneous chaos[J]. Amer. J. Math., 1938, (60): 897-936.
12. Li T Y, Yorke J A. Period three implies chaos[J]. Amer. Math., 1975, (82): 985-992.
13. Cameron R, Martin W. The orthogonal development of nonlinear functional in series of Fourier-Hermite functional[J]. Ann. Math., 1947, 48: 385.