Biofilm-detached cells, a transition from a sessile to a planktonic phenotype: A comparative study of adhesion and physiological characteristics in pseudomonas aeruginosa

FEMS Microbiology Letters

Volumn 290, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 135-142

  Rollet, Cécile ^a,b   Gal, Laurent ^a   Guzzo, Jean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Antibiotic susceptibility; Biofilm forming capacity; Cell surface properties; Detached cells; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Indexed keywords

AMIKACIN; AZTREONAM; CEFEPIME; CEFTAZIDIME; CIPROFLOXACIN; COLISTIN; FOSFOMYCIN; GENTAMICIN; IMIPENEM; NETILMICIN; SULFANILAMIDE; TICARCILLIN; TIMENTIN; TOBRAMYCIN;

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BIOFILM; CELL SURFACE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; KINETICS; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PLANKTON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SESSILE SPECIES;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOFILMS; PHENOTYPE; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA;

EID: 57449110947     PISSN: 03781097     EISSN: 15746968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01415.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allison DG, Evans DJ, Brown MRW Gilbert P (1990) Possible involvement of the division cycle in dispersal of Escherichia coli from biofilms. J Bacteriol 172 : 1667 1669.
2. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC Turck M (1966) Antibiotics susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 45 : 493 496.
3. Bellon-Fontaine MN, Rault J van Oss CJ (1996) Microbial adhesion to solvents: a novel method to determine the electron-donor/electron-acceptor or Lewis acid-base properties of microbial cells. Colloid Surface B 7 : 47 53.
4. Bester E, Wolfaardt G, Joubert L, Garny K Saftic S (2005) Planktonic-cell yield of a pseudomonad biofilm. Appl Environ Microbiol 71 : 7792 7798.
5. Boles BR, Thoendel M Singh PK (2004) Self-generated diversity produces "insurance effects" in biofilm communities. P Natl Acad Sci USA 101 : 16630 16635.
6. Challan-Belval S, Gal L, Margiewes S, Garmyn D, Piveteau P Guzzo J (2006) Assessment of the roles of LuxS, S-ribosyl homocysteine, and autoinducer 2 in cell attachment during biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e. Appl Environ Microbiol 72 : 2644 2650.
7. Chapalain JC Puyhardy JM (1997) Moyens d'évaluation et critères de choix d'un disinfectant à l'hôpital. Revue Fr Lab 291 : 69 75.
8. Chavant P, Martinie B, Meylheuc T, Bellon-Fontaine MN Hebraud M (2002) Listeria monocytogenes LO28: surface physicochemical properties and ability to form biofilms at different temperatures and growth phases. Appl Environ Microbiol 68 : 728 737.
9. Christensen BB, Sternberg C, Andersen JB, Eberl L, Moller S, Givskov M Molin S (1998) Establishment of new genetic traits in a microbial biofilm community. Appl Environ Microbiol 64 : 2247 55.
10. Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (2008) Recommandations du CASFM. Société Française de Microbiologie, Paris, France.
11. Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, Dasgupta M Marrie TJ (1987) Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol 41 : 435 464.
12. Costerton JW, Stewart PS Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284 : 1318 1322.
13. Davey ME O'toole GA (2000) Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol R 64 : 847 867.
14. Davies D (2003) Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2 : 114 122.
15. De Kievit TR, Gillis R, Marx S, Brown C Iglewski BH (2001) Quorum-sensing genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: their role and expression patterns. Appl Environ Microbiol 67 : 1865 1873.
16. Donlan RM (2002) Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis 8 : 881 890.
17. Donlan RM Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15 : 167 193.
18. Dunne WMJ (2002) Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately? Clin Microbiol Rev 15 : 155 166.
19. Espigares E, Bueno A, Fernandez-Crehuet M Espigares M (2003) Efficacy of some neutralizers in suspension tests determining the activity of disinfectants. J Hosp Infect 55 : 137 140.
20. Fux CA, Costerton JW, Stewart PS Stoodley P (2005) Survival strategies of infectious biofilms. Trends Microbiol 13 : 34 40.
21. Gilbert P, Evans DJ Brown MRW (1993) Formation and dispersal of bacterial biofilms in vivo and in situ. J Appl Bacteriol Symp 74 : (suppl) : 67S 78S.
22. Gilbert P, Das J Foley I (1997) Biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobials. Adv Dent Res 11 : 160 167.
23. Hunt SM, Werner EM, Huang B, Hamilton MA Stewart PS (2004) Hypothesis for the role of nutrient starvation in biofilm detachment. Appl Environ Microbiol 70 : 7418 7425.
24. Jefferson KK (2004) What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol Lett 236 : 163 173.
25. Kaplan JB, Meyenhofer MF Fine DH (2003) Biofilm growth and detachment of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J Bacteriol 185 : 1399 1404.
26. Ly MH, Vo NH, Le TM, Belin JM Waché Y (2006) Diversity of the surface properties of Lactococci and consequences on adhesion to food components. Colloid Surface B 52 : 149 153.
27. O'Toole G, Kaplan HB Kolter R (2000) Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu Rev Microbiol 54 : 49 79.
28. O'Toole GA Kolter R (1998) Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol Microbiol 30 : 295 304.
29. Pelletier C, Bouley C, Cayuela C, Bouttier S, Bourlioux P Bellon-Fontaine MN (1997) Cell surface characteristics of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 63 : 1725 1731.
30. Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, Costerton JW Davies DG (2002) Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol 184 : 1140 1154.
31. Xu KD, Stewart PS, Xia F, Huang CT McFeters GA (1998) Spatial physiological heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm is determined by oxygen availability. Appl Environ Microbiol 64 : 4035 4039.
32. Ymele-Leki P Ross JM (2007) Erosion from Staphylococcus aureus biofilms grown under physiologically relevant fluid shear forces yields bacterial cells with reduced avidity to collagen. Appl Environ Microbiol 73 : 1834 1841.