Credibility

Conservation Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1365-1367

  Alagona, Peter S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ETHICS; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; STANDARD; ZOOLOGY;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; ZOOLOGY;

EID: 57449104021     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01109.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Chan, K. M. A. 2008. Value and advocacy in conservation biology: crisis discipline or discipline in crisis? Conservation Biology 22 : 1 3.
2. Cuarón, A. D., and P. C. de Grammont. 2007. Shortcomings of threatened species categorization systems: reply to Soberón and Medellin. Conservation Biology 21 : 1368 1370.
3. Gill, B. R. 2001. Professionalism advocacy, and credibility: a futile cycle? Human Dimensions of Wildlife 6 : 21 32.
4. Minnis, D. L., and R. J. Stout McPeake. 2001. An analysis of advocacy within the wildlife profession. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 6 : 1 10.
5. Porter, T. 1995. Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
6. Rigg, C. M. 2001. Orchestrating ecosystem management: challenges and lessons from Sequoia National Forest. Conservation Biology 15 : 78 90.
7. Shapin, S. 1995. Cordelia's love: credibility and the social studies of science. Perspectives on Science 3 : 255 275.
8. Shrader-Frechette, K. 1996. Throwing out the bathwater of positivism, keeping the baby of objectivity: relativism and objectivity in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 10 : 912 914.
9. Thomas, J. W., and D. W. Pletscher. 2002. The "Lynx Affair": professional credibility on the line. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30 : 1281 1286.
10. Wilson, E. O. 2006. The creation: an appeal to save life on earth. W.W. Norton, New York.