Basic digital photography in dermatology

Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 532-536

  Kaliyadan, Feroze ^a   Manoj, Jayasree ^a   Venkitakrishnan, S ^a   Dharmaratnam, A ^a  

^a AMRITA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Clinical photography; Dermatology; Digital photography

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DERMATOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL IMAGING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMAGE QUALITY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSICIAN; REVIEW; TELEDERMATOLOGY; TOOTH; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 57449100060     PISSN: 03786323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.44334     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Wilson TV, Nice K, Gurevich G. How digital cameras work. Available from: http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/digital-camera.htm. [Last accessed 20 Aug 2007].
2. Siegel DM. Resolution in digital imaging: enough already? Semin Cutan Med Surg 2002;21:209-15.
3. Bittorf A, Fartasch M, Schuler G, Diepgen TL. Resolution requirements for digital images in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997;37:195-8.
4. Miot HA, Paixão MP, Paschoal FM. Basics of digital photography in Dermatology. An Bras Dermatol 2006;81:174-80.
5. Pak HS. Dermatologic Photography [homepage] American Telemedicine Association; 1999. Available from: http://www.atmeda.org/ICOT/telederm%20Forms/ GuidetoDermatologicPhotography.pdf. [Last accessed 20 Aug 2007].
6. st ed. Mosby; 2003. p. 33-42.
7. Cutrone M, Grimalt R. The true and the false: Pixel-byte syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol 2001;18:523-6.
8. Suvarna SK, Ansary MA. Histopathology and the 'third great lie': When is an image not a scientifically authentic image? Histopathology 2001;39:441-6.
9. Kvedar JC, Edwards RA, Menn ER, Mofid M, Gonzalez E, Dover J, et al. The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. Arch Dermatol 1997;133:161-7.