Three-dimensional 26-core biopsy-based patient selection criteria for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: Original article: Clinical investigation

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1061-1066

  Numao, Noboru ^a   Kawakami, Satoru ^a   Yonese, Junji ^b   Koga, Fumitaka ^a   Saito, Kazutaka ^a   Fujii, Yasuhisa ^a   Ishikawa, Yuichi ^c   Fukui, Iwao ^b   Kihara, Kazunori ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b CANCER INSTITUTE HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c CANCER INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Extraprostatic extension; Nerve sparing; Prostate biopsy; Radical prostatectomy; Statistical model

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER SIZE; EVALUATION; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NERVE SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL PATIENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TISSUE SECTION;

AGED; BIOPSY; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 57449092523     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02162.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: Results at 10 years. J. Urol. 1994 152 : 1831 6.
2. Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Fleischmann A, Thalmann GN, Schumacher M, Studer UE. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy - does it have an impact on urinary continence? J. Urol. 2006 176 : 189 95.
3. Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int. 2006 97 : 1234 41.
4. Ohori M, Kattan MW, Koh H et al. Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: A nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J. Urol. 2004 71 : 1844 9.
5. Naya Y, Slaton JW, Troncoso P, Okihara K, Babaian RJ. Tumor length and location of cancer on biopsy predict for side-specific extraprostatic cancer extension. J. Urol. 2004 171 : 1093 7.
6. Tsuzuki T, Hernandez DJ, Aydin H, Trock B, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. J. Urol. 2005 173 : 450 3.
7. Kamat AM, Jacobsohn KM, Troncoso P, Shen Y, Wen S, Babaian RJ. Validation of criteria used to predict extraprostatic cancer extension: A tool for use in selecting patients for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2005 174 : 1262 5.
8. Elabbady AA, Khedr MM. Extended 12-core prostate biopsy increases both the detection of prostate cancer and the accuracy of Gleason score. Eur. Urol. 2006 49 : 49 53.
9. Kawakami S, Hyochi N, Yonese J et al. Three-dimensional combination of transrectal and transperineal biopsies for efficient detection of stage T1c prostate cancer. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006 11 : 127 32.
10. Kawakami S, Okuno T, Yonese J et al. Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: A recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Eur. Urol. 2007 51 : 675 82.
11. Kawakami S, Yamamoto S, Numao N, Ishikawa Y, Kazunori K, Fukui I. Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer. Int. J. Urol. 2007 14 : 719 24.
12. Numao N, Kawakami S, Yokoyama M et al. Improved accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer by three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Eur. Urol. 2007 52 : 1663 8.
13. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, Myers L, Bachmann LM, Kleijnen J. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: A systematic review. J. Urol. 2006 1605 12.
14. Ochiai A, Trpkov K, Yilmaz A, Donnelly B, Babaian RJ. Validation of a prediction model for low volume/low grade cancer: Application in selecting patients for active surveillance. J. Urol. 2007 177 : 907 10.
15. Singh H, Canto EI, Shariat SF et al. Six additional systematic lateral cores enhance sextant biopsy prediction of pathological features at radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2004 171 : 204 9.
16. Naya Y, Ochiai A, Troncoso P, Babaian RJ. A comparison of extended biopsy and sextant biopsy schemes for predicting the pathological stage of prostate cancer. J. Urol. 2004 171 : 2203 8.
17. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr., Amin MB, LL E. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005 29 : 1228 42.
18. Srigley JR, Amin MB, Epstein JI et al. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinomas of the prostate gland. Arch. Pathol Lab. Med. 2006 130 : 936 46.
19. NCCN Practice Guideline in Oncology - Prostate Cancer Early Detection. V.2.2007. [Cited 15 Dec 2007.] Available from URL: http://www.nccn.org/ professionals/physician-gls/PDF/prostate-detection.pdf
20. Makarov DV, Sanderson H, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: Is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores? J. Urol. 2002 167 : 2440 2.
21. Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB et al. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology 2007 69 : 1095 101.
22. Ochiai A, Troncoso P, Chen ME, Lloreta J, Babaian RJ. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: Implication for expectant management. J. Urol. 2005 174 : 2164 8.
23. Egevad L, Norberg M, Mattson S, Norlén BJ, Busch C. Estimation of prostate cancer volume by multiple core biopsies before radical prostatectomy. Urology 1998 52 : 653 8.