White pine, Japanese larch, and bear oak respond differently to partial defoliation

Northeastern Naturalist

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 319-330

  Vanderklein, Dirk ^a   Daquila, Elizabeth ^a   Carrozza, Elisabeth ^a  

^a MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5744255118     PISSN: 10926194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1656/1092-6194(2001)008[0319:WPJLAB]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ABRAMS, M.D., J.C. SCHULTZ, and K.W. KLEINER. 1990. Ecophysiologi-cal responses in mesic versus xeric hardwood species to an early season drought in central Pennsylvania. Forest Science 36:970-981.
2. BRYANT, J.P., F.S. CHAPIN III, and D.R. KLEIN. 1983. Carbon/Nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357-368.
3. CHAPIN III, F.S. 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13:233-260.
4. COLEY, P.D. 1988. Effects of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of anti-herbivore defense. Oecologia 74:531-536.
5. ERICSSON, A., J. HELLKVIST, K. HILLERDAL-HAGERSTRÖMER, S. LARSSON, E. MATTSON-DJOS, and O. TENOW. 1980. Consumption and pine growth - hypotheses on effects on growth processes by needle-eating insects. Ecological Bulletin 32:537-545.
6. GOWER, S.T., and J.H. RICHARDS. 1991. Larches: deciduous conifers in an evergreen world. Bioscience 40:818-826.
7. GULMON, S.L., and H.A. MOONEY. 1986. Costs of defense and their effects on plant productivity. In T.J. Givnish (Ed.). On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, MA. 717 pp.
8. HARRIS, P. 1974. A possible explanation of plant yield increases following insect damage. Agro-Ecosystems 1:219-225.
9. 2 assimilation of primary and regrowth foliage of red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and red oak (Quercus rubra L.): response to defoliation. Oecologia 57:14-19.
10. HJÄLTÉN, J., K. DANELL, and L. ERICSON. 1993. Effects of simulated herbivory and intraspecific competition on the compensatory ability of birches. Ecology 74:1136-1142.
11. HOBBS, R.J. 1997. Can we use plant functional types to describe and predict responses to environmental change? In T.M. Smith, H.H. Shugart, and F.I Woodward (Eds.). Plant Functional Types: Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change. International Geosphere - Biosphere Programme Book series. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, MA. 369 pp.
12. LOVETT, G.M., and P. TOBIESSEN. 1993. Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in red oaks (Quercus rubra L.) subject to defoliation and nitrogen stress. Tree Physiology 12:259-269.
13. MAIER, C.A., and R.O. TESKEY. 1992. Internal and external control of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of mature eastern white pine (Pinus strobus). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22:1387-1394.
14. MASCHINSKY, J., and T.G. WHITHAM. 1989. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability and timing. The American Naturalist 134:1-19.
15. NIEMELA, P., J. TUOMI, R. MANNILA, and P. OJALA. 1984. The effect of previous damage on the quality of Scots pine foliage as food for Diprionid sawflies. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Entomologie 98:33-43.
16. REICH, P.B., M.B. WALTERS, S.C. KRAUSE, D.W. VANDERKLEIN, K.F. RAFFA, and T. TABONE. 1993. Growth, nutrition and gas exchange of Pinus resinosa following artificial defoliation. Trees 7:67-77.
17. SCHULZE, E.-D., and F.S. CHAPIN III. 1987. Plant specialization to environments of different resource availability. Ecological Studies: analysis and synthesis 61:120-148.
18. SNEDECOR, G.W., and W.G. COCHRAN. 1980. Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press. Ames, IA. 507 pp.
19. TUOMI, J., P. NILSSON, and M. ÅSTRÖM. 1994. Plant compensation responses: bud dormancy as an adaptation to herbivory. Ecology 75:1429-1436.
20. VANDERKLEIN, D.W. 1995. Whole plant physiology and growth of evergreen and deciduous conifers in response to defoliation intensity and history. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.
21. VANDERKLEIN, D.W., and P.B. REICH. 1999. The effect of defoliation intensity and history on physiology, growth and carbohydrate allocation of two conifers with contrasting leaf lifespans and growth habits. New Phytologist 144:121-132.
22. VANDERKLEIN, D.W., and P.B. REICH. 2000. Larch and pine respond similarly during three years of partial defoliation. Tree Physiology 20: 283-287.
23. WRIGHT, L.C., and A.A. BERRYMAN. 1978. Effect of defoliation by the Douglas-fir tussock moth on moisture stress in grand fir and subsequent attack by the fir engraver beetle (Coleoptera scolytidae). USDA Forest Service Research Note PNW-323, 14 pp.